the polls had raw data and then they forced the answers into their polling template. It turned out those which were using the 2008 template were not far off... but... a polls I reviewed even found more republicans in the survey and then they skewed it to D plus 7. so even the correct polls were not using the raw data. As it turned out... I just heard fewer people voted for Obama than 2008, as we predicted... what surprised...was the fact fewer people voted from Romney than McCain.
lol. you believe an invisible man in the sky made the world and you call me anti science? you have no shame.
A lawyer repeatedly spelling cite, a key word of the trade, as site !!?? An extra on Law and Order SVU maybe, even that's a stretch. Tell me about it, you're not kidding.
Cherish everything what you can. He sure cleaned up with the EC. By the way your disappointment would be less, had you trusted real science in polling.... Then you wouldn't have your hopes up....
the real science of polling still comes down to picking the correct template. I was convinced Obama would not turn out as many voters as he did in 2008. I was right about that. I expected more people to vote for Romney than McCain I was wrong about that.
by the way freethinker... freethought is compatible with theism and incompatible with stating you know there is no God. because the process of thinking you can prove there is no god is delusional given our current science. in short you calling yourself a freethinker makes you an ironic joke.