the echo chamber. <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fZgQhnNRSuw?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The map you posted is the joke,they aren't even following their own rules.A state is supposed to lean to a candidate when its +5 yet they have PA as toss up Another state they have as toss up .Romney isnt winning 1 poll but its listed as toss up
ak by a slight augmentation to your concepts... move florida in Romneys column because he leads in 6 or 7 polls and obama only has one super slanted poll and it only got him to plus 1. or if you wish to play games.... gallup plus 7... and crushing with independents. put the whole country in Romneys column except for CA and NY.
Love Those Libs! <iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SeJbOU4nmHQ?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Sorry to burst your bubble, but NJ is in Obama's camp also, too many folks around here love the nanny state...
I've tried explaining to jem how silly it is to use mid term turn out as a template for a presidential election turn out prediction but he just doesn't get it.
You're right. Looks like 2004 might be a better template. With Mitt Romney running ahead of Obama nationally, 2004 is shaping up to be a much more instructive baseline for the upcoming elections than Obamaâs historic win in 2008. Indeed, only eight House Republicans hold districts that John Kerry won in 2004. That, more than anything, explains how the Democratic expectation of being within striking distance of the majority is falling far short of reality. Call it the 2008 illusion. http://www.nationaljournal.com/colu...for-democrats-it-s-not-2008-any-more-20121018