typical leftist crap... attack the messenger when you can't engage in the facts. 1. Do undecideds break against the incumbent or not. 2. The funny thing about your critique is that no one could be more wrong than any of the economists who have supported obamanomics like Krugman and Goolsbee and the leftist media who supported the idea the way to fix a debt problem is more debt.
i will take them over you many times debunked theory that cutting taxes from here will increase revenue and jumpstart the economy. under obama the market is back, housing is comming back,business is very profitable,auto sales are back,airline are in the black,retirement plans have been restored,the wars are winding down, what does your side have to offer except bush 2? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=249997
more leftist lies... how can you debunk cutting taxes... when kennedy cut taxes- revenues went up reagan cut taxes - revenues went up bush cut taxes - reveneues went up and Keynes himself said when in a recession you cut taxes and grow you way out.
The GOP will take the Senate in 2010 http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/90873-gop-will-win-house-senate MORRIS: GOP will win House, Senate By Dick Morris - 04/06/10 " Republicans will gain more than 50 House seats and at least 10 in the Senate, enough to take control in both chambers. Thatâs reality."-Dick Morris A week before 2008 election day dick said undecideds would break for McCain and Obama would get less then 50 % of the vote. http://www.dickmorris.com/undecideds-should-break-for-mccain/ Hilary will win the nomination http://www.dickmorris.com/how-clinton-will-win-the-nomination-by-losing-south-carolina/ <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/t6B06ytNq-g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
When things look good, or good things are said about the left, then the right says it's because of the lame stream media, polling errors, bumper stickers and all that nonsense. Now they bring on Dick Morris, and accuse you of trashing the messenger. OK.
Keynes said cut taxes, but on who? Revenues rose because of other variables in play, which you previously admitted. The other major variable is, government spending! Which Keynes also, in fact primarily, advocated. Reagan did it, "Morning in America", thanks to massive government war machine spending. Also doubled our foreign debt and turned us, for the first time, into a debtor nation.
IIRC That is based on a flawed study on Congress races,not Presidential races I doubt incumbent presidents would get re elected 70 % of the time if undecideds broke against the incumbent
Do Personal Income Tax Cuts Foster Growth? Again, No Martin Feldstein and Doug Elmendorf discovered something surprising in 1989. So much so that when they presented it to a National Bureau of Economic Research conference, they titled their paper (PDF) âBudget Deficits, Tax Incentives and Inflation: A Surprising Lesson From the 1983-1984 Recovery.â Feldstein had been Ronald Reaganâs chief economic adviser during that recovery; Elmendorf now runs the Congressional Budget Office. In 1989, they were surprised to read in their own data that the recovery that began in 1983 had been caused mainly by an expansionary monetary policy. (To a lesser extent, it had come from growth in business investment after changes to corporate taxes in 1981.) Feldstein and Elmendorf pointed out that the recovery had not been caused, as was popularly thought at the time, by reductions in the personal income tax rate. http://mobile.businessweek.com/arti...ULSE&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews