If the US economy is "collapsing" I'm sure going to hate to see it when it recovers! Jaysus I'm busy.
. September 22, 2012 SouthAmerica: If you vote for Mitt Romney, then you are voting for the âlap dogâ of the "Anti-Christ", the insane, and raving lunatic Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. US democracy only belongs to the rich: Michael Prysner â September 21, 2012 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DvTvZBUsxZc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> ***** US, Israel seek excuse for war with Iran: James Fetzer â September 21, 2012 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VjBDqBQf9SI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Press TV has conducted an interview with James H. Fetzer, American philosopher and political commentator, to further discuss the issue. .
If you are going to bring the anti christ into this... you need to learn a little bit about eschatology and the Mahdi... Ahmadinejad... references the Mahdi and ends times all the time. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad beckons the Mahdi http://www.economicvoice.com/irania...ejad-beckons-the-mahdi/50017328#axzz27EUK3xeg
general Election: Gallup Tracking Obama 47, Romney 47 Tie General Election: Rasmussen Tracking Obama 46, Romney 46 Tie so we have the two best polls showing this is a tie. I will say that I was wondering why Romney was not pounding the airwaves... now I know why. thanks for the post AK.s I think its time he brings some of his own money in. He can win this if he hammers home Obama economic and ME failures.
most of those polls presume the 2008 electorate. no one is accounting for the fact, I believe more Rs will turnout than dems. Imagine the score if we sampled white males with jobs who were not jewish, gay or govt workers. would that be a realistic poll. Its the same thing when these polls oversample dems by 15 to 30 percent.
Jem, now that you mentioned the movie Khartoum (1966) â by the way, a very good movie. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2HcQ_IveQCI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> .
This is the guy S.A. wants to have nuclear weapons and S.A. calls the other guy the anti christ. http://www.meforum.org/1985/ahmadinejad-and-the-mahdi If past Iranian presidents have mentioned Mahdism, Ahmadinejad has made it a focal point of his rhetoric. In September 2005, he sponsored the first annual International Conference of Mahdism Doctrine in Tehran. The conference presented Mahdism as an ideology that could form the basis for world peace and unity across religions. Addressing the conference, Ahmadinejad said that the "Islamic Republic and the system of velayat-e faqih have no other mission but to prepare for the establishment of a world government . . . as the Imam [Mahdi] runs and manages the universe." He repeated the same idea but modified his language at the second conference in 2006, saying the "Mahdavi perception [Mahdism] and view are the perfect method for the administration and direction of the world."...[10]
. Your Sunday Message http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...68843403228.2011830.1290360310&type=1&theater
S.A. you need to drop the party line. Being pro Brazil does not mean you have to be pro Iran having a nuke. Being anti the Isreali govt does not mean you should support Iran getting Nuclear bomb. How about exercising a little of your intellect and agreeing ahmadinejad is not the type of guy you would want to have control over a nuke in the ME. Note... I have nothing against the Iranian people.