of course you like their sample as a top 2 pollster... its very slanted Dem. Strong Democrat ............................................... 22 Not very strong Democrat ................................. 10 Independent/lean Democrat .............................. 10 Strictly Independent .......................................... 16 Independent/lean Republican ............................ 12 Not very strong Republican ............................... 7 Strong Republican ............................................. 18 Other (VOL) ....................................................... 2 Not sure ........................................................... 3 + Results shown reflect responses among registered voters. Dem 42/ Ind. 16 / Rep 37 and in 2010 the electorate was D 35/ I 30 / R 35.
No,I like them because of their record NBC/WSJ polls from 2008.Every one of their polls from March to election day had Obama ahead.Unlike Rasmussen they never had McCain ahead
Its time I ask this question.. what the hell is fox and the journal doing with their names on polls which over sample dems.. even hanity was talking about over sampling the other night.
You can keep saying this but it doesn't make it true. To prove that a polling agency's sample of a population is invalid or unreliable you will need the services of a polling agency.
the dates on your posts were early aug... pre ryan - pre convention. I a nyt cbs poll from sept 12. that is a times polling showing Romney by a lot with Independents.
Probably because they dont want to have the reputation of having biased and inaccurate polls like Rasmussen .