Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Apr 13, 2012.

  1. I have no idea what post you're talking about. Can you be more specific or point me to my reply?
     
    #2161     Sep 15, 2012
  2. jem

    jem

    Perhaps I read you wrong...

    I see, your liberal passions have been hurt. You think that was Obama? I thought you see yourself as a market strategist and trader.

    What happens when QE stops working or the member banks finally clear themselves of their upside down assets?
     
    #2162     Sep 15, 2012
  3. Bernanke I suppose? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3573307&highlight=bernanke#post3573307

    So you're concerned about a crash? The best asset protection is a bear risk reversal in that case. Protection? You'll be rich! You don't even talk a good game. Asset protection for you and mommy, in mofo Belize? I hear there are some opps in the Ivory Coast. Look into it.

    I am as liberal as you are. It offends you that your cultist is going to get slaughtered in Nov. Romney is a d-bag of epic proportions and destroyed virtually every deal he was part of. A prime example is Dade Behring.

    I don't give a rat's ass that you think I am a lib. I canvassed for the Paul campaign.
     
    #2163     Sep 15, 2012
  4. jem

    jem

    I am still a trader and have to envision all scenarios. I made a great money in bear markets, so part of me likes them. My business does better in bear markets... so I mostly go long right now.

    Romney was not my choice... ron paul was... but I will say ron was looking a little mentally fatigued during the debates, he did not drive home some of his points well. He was acting like we did not get it... but he really got lost in some circular points.
     
    #2164     Sep 15, 2012
  5. I have my problems with Paul as well, but as the lesser of evils he was the only choice.
     
    #2165     Sep 15, 2012
  6. Dude, no argument on Romney, but u gotta admit Obama is a socialist of epic proportions?!

    If u agree on that point, u have vote Romney just to have a guy fighting for keeping the money u rightfully made as your own.

    Lesser of two evil is my point.
     
    #2166     Sep 15, 2012
  7. Here's a defination of socialism:

    Date: 1837
    1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
    2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
    3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done


    Obama has not advocated any of those. He does not fit the defination of a socialist.
     
    #2167     Sep 15, 2012
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Obamacare certainly meets the definition of socialism.
     
    #2168     Sep 15, 2012
  9. pspr

    pspr

    So does Government Motors and that was just his warm-up act.

    Besides, definition #3 that littlearrow neglected to mention covers Obama better at this stage:

    3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
     
    #2169     Sep 15, 2012
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Yeah that one too.
     
    #2170     Sep 15, 2012