Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Please fucking tell me you're joking about I.D.

 

I just explained to you why there is little to no edge in the intrade market.
But I will make it more clear... you have to discount the risk of war... or natural disaster...


Finally did you not comprehend that I would never purchase an intrade ticket... unless i thought the odds were so good and that I would win so much, I would not mind letting a law enforcement agent have potential proof of a crime.

 

Just check out any of jem's evolution denying posts and threads and his firm belief in ID. They dovetail quite nicely with his climate change denial posts and threads. Seriously.

 

you are such a loser Brass...

I am still waiting for you to show me proof we evolved from non life.

 

if you believe anything Brass tells you, you are the idiot.

 

Are you saying you do not believe in "intelligent design?" State it here for the record so I can bookmark it.

 

I am saying I separate out science from faith.

1. Nobel prize winners state...

a. we have no proof life evolved from non life but once we had life, we evolved.

... a subset of that understanding is that some top scientists state there was likely not enough time on earth for life to evolved... but science is looking for answers.



2.
I also state that Hawking and just about every other top cosmologist and physicist states... that if you just look at it from the perspective of our one universe... our universe looks incredibly fine tuned for life...

but.. most of theses scientists... hope or suspect we will find that:

a. this apparent fine tuning can be explained by the fact we will some day find almost infinite other universes or

b. science will find a theory of everything... which may explain we feel there is fine tuning.

note.
few if any trained top physicists deny the appearance of fine tuning.

 

I can prove it!!!! Here is my proof:

1) Rocks are non-life.
2) Brass is dumb as a rock.
3) Thus, man must have evolved from rocks!

Or is that a Theorem?

 

All you've proven is that there is NO TRADE you would make do to any foreseeable mitigation. Sounds like a real pro.

 

Please stop with the equivocation and obfuscation. Just answer the question. If it helps, let me break it down into 2 easier questions:

1. Are you saying you have not repeatedly disputed evolutionary science in P&R?

2. Are you saying you have not repeatedly supported the premise of "intelligent" design" in P&R threads discussing evolution at least implicitly by dismissing evolutionary science?