I'm about to break jems heart.On a electoral basis even Rasmussen has Obama winning the election Check out the overly republican biased Rasmussen polls in swing states Rasmussen- Obama + 4 Rasmussen- Obama + 6 Rasmussen- Obama + 3 Rasmussen- Obama + 5 Rasmussen- Obama + 2 Rasmussen- Obama + 1
ricter is going back to take drive by pot shots... since he can not argue with the polling logic. the data is in the polls themselves... if you subtract out the 7- 11 points of from the dem column and put them back in the independent column... you realize Romney has about a 5 to 7 point lead in a sample which would look like the 2010 election -- which was 35D/35R/30I
Once again you selectively slant Go to the Rasmuessen map. Look at the toss up states like Florida IA NC in Romneys favor. Romney is leading in plenty of them and by election time they will be many more in his camp. Romney does not even have the nomination yet. Obama is a one termer. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard
No pot shots from me, and thank you Jem for being man enough to actually make a decent bet for charity with me. The rest of the all noise, no backbone guys, come on, I want take advantage of the obvious, Obama's winning numbers. Come on, not even a few bucks? Yeah, more crickets, not one true believer except for Jem.
OK http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard Obama 247 Romney 191 BTW,Rasmussen has states like OH,WI and VA as toss up but their state polls has Obama in the lead in those states
OK then, I understand that you know Romney is the obvious loser. Fair enough. As a real trader, I just have to exploit the edges when I see them. Ok, Lucrum now understands that the race is not to the swift, but it's still the way to bet, or not bet. Ok by me.