This is the most loony bit of logic I have seen from you on this thread. Partisan much? What it your point... a poll with an 11 point skew to dems is accurate? I call a big shit poll... NBC called their own poll a shit poll... you call it accurate? "This morning, on MSNBC's Morning Joe, NBC political director Chuck Todd admitted their poll had a skewed sample (around 3:50 mark) and stated that, if this poll were weighted similarly to their last poll, the race would have been unchanged, instead of Obama extending his lead over Romney to 6 points. "
With a track record like this hell yeah I call them accurate NBC /WSJ polls from 2008 Presidential Election(Obama won by +7)
NBC /WSJ polls for the 2012 Presidential Election.Looks very similar to their 2008 polls in which they had Obama(The winner) ahead as far back as March
obamaloon in full. so which NBC poll are you supporting... their 11 point skew or their previous 6 point skew ---------------------------------------- This morning, on MSNBC's Morning Joe, NBC political director Chuck Todd admitted their poll had a skewed sample (around 3:50 mark) and stated that, if this poll were weighted similarly to their last poll, the race would have been unchanged, instead of Obama extending his lead over Romney to 6 points. "
With a track record like this I dont care if they have a 50 point skew.They're obviously doing something right if they had Obama ahead in every one of their polls from March to election day in 2008,unlike Rasmussen who often had McCain ahead NBC /WSJ polls from 2008 Presidential Election(Obama won by +7)
you are supporting their poll. Ok we get it. But the poll creator stated they "overskewed" one... so I wanted to know are you supporting the NBC polls as accurate when they over skew by 11 or just when they skew by 6 points.
Researching previous polls its clear so called skewing doesn't matter as long as the results are random NBC/WSJ poll 11-2-2008.Obama + 8 http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/081103_NBC-WSJ_Poll.pdf More dems then republicans in poll.Poll is correct within 1 point NBC/WSJ poll 10-5-2008.Obama + 6 http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/081006_NBC-WSJ_Full_Release.pdf More dems then republicans in poll.Poll is correct within 1 point NBC/WSJ poll 10-20-2008.Obama +10 http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJ_NBCPoll_102108.pdf More dems then republicans in poll.Poll is correct within 3 points Sorry republicans but your bullshit skewing argument has been put to rest
looney? does not even cover what is going on right now. what the hell does this mean... "Researching previous polls its clear so called skewing doesn't matter as long as the results are random" we have a simple concept here. Would you expect a poll with an 11 point skew to have a different tally than a poll with a six point skew... which do you think is more accurate... what does nbc say. I did not want random results... I want predictions based on the likely turnout. ---- This morning, on MSNBC's Morning Joe, NBC political director Chuck Todd admitted their poll had a skewed sample (around 3:50 mark) and stated that, if this poll were weighted similarly to their last poll, the race would have been unchanged, instead of Obama extending his lead over Romney to 6 points. "