Five more months of this... sigh. If the race is close then arguing it makes no difference, but if the race is not close then arguing it makes no difference. /rant
Oh, sorry i should have said "in the last 75 years.... either way what i said holds true, some stats are going to be broken in this election regardless, so its stupid to cling to those 2 stats.
Ya, if you haven't noticed, things have gone rather quiet here for the most part. The die is cast. I am trying to find things to post on that are more interesting, but it is hard in this current news cycle.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows Mitt Romney attracting 48% of the vote, while President Obama earns 44%. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided. Matchup results are updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). New numbers from the swing state of Iowa show a toss-up with Romney picking up 47% of the vote to Obama's 46%. In that state, Romney has a 10-point advantage on the question of who is trusted more to deal with the economy. The race is also a toss-up in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and Colorado. Romney leads in North Carolina and Missouri. Obama leads in Pennsylvania. New numbers from Wisconsin will be released at noon Eastern today. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
So here's my question. If the news flow tends to favor a particular spectrum politically, wouldn't it follow that the people on the other spectrum become quiet for a while? Ie, if a lot of negative Obama news comes out, isn't it harder for an Obama supporter to post in defense? They would certainly become less inclined to post.