Obama said during the campaign that he would end the Iraq war and send more troops to Afghanistan to take out Al quada McCain said he would keep troops in Afghanistan,keep troops in Iraq and promised more wars were coming I voted for the guy who promised the least amount of war 2012 Obama has ended The Iraq war ,set a time to leave Afghanistan, has cut defense spending and is taking a much lesser aggressive stance towards Iran Romney wont say when he will leave Afghanistan,says that we should still be in Iraq ,wants to increase the 700 billion dollar a year defense budget and has promised a very aggressive foreign policy stance towards Iran and other countries Again,I am voting for the guy promising less war and cutting military industrial complex spending.
Harvard Jd/MBA Gov of a very Liberal state Highly successful business man Super competent running the Olympics He has more Presidential material than the current President who still has not really run anything competently.
wait let me guess after shilling for Obama for 4 years... you just made up your mind to vote for him. You need a new routine. No one here thinks you are an open minded voter. You have had an agenda for years.
1. I was not trying to be deep I was writing for an audience that might be the least receptive to the liberal lies we see here everyday. (pretty shallow) 2. Romney is warming up... he was pretty bland. But the base is going to be excited about avoiding four more years of decimation. 3. Obama may be the status quo, but evangelicals have now seen what Obama and Obamacare will do. Right now on the constitutional right of religious freedom, the Obama administration is seen as only one step up from Pilate.
You must have missed all those posts I made stating I would vote for Paul over Obama in a general election
Making him just as big a warmonger as the rest. We had already done most of the damage to the Taliban before Bush left office. We're just spinning our wheels over now and have been the entire time Obama has been the CIC. War IS war, you can't be a little bit pregnant. Go ahead and rationalize and delude yourself all you want though. Obviously you're good at that or you'd never supported BO to begin with.
While its true most of the damage to the Taliban had been done before Bush left office,Bin Laden and 22 of the top 30 Al Qaeda leaders were killed in Afghanistan/Pakistan under Obama Yes war is war and you can't be a little bit pregnant,but you can have one baby at the end of 3 years or you can have 3 babies at the end of 3 years.McCain would have had 3 babies(Iraq,Afghanistan/Iran) You Go ahead and rationalize and delude yourself all you want .You claim to be against the wars and to much spending but vote for the party that started the wars,wants to continue the wars,increased defense spending from 300 billion under Clinton to 700 billion under Bush ,turned Clinton's balanced budget to a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit etc Romeny is now promising you he will keep the Bush tax cuts,cut individual taxes even more,cut the corporate tax,increase defense spending and cut the deficit and hes going to pay for all that by cutting social programs...and you believe it
AK - I am giving you a hard time true. But come on we know you have a brain... now you are patronizing us but it is so far fetched it something else. Its like saying I would vote for Obama if he would eliminate personal income tax, replace it with a flat tax on corps, ban any form of giving money to politicians for anything and make sure neither congress or the Fed debased the dollar. Oh wait... that would be like voting for Paul.
Just take a look at all my anti war/ anti military industrial complex spending posts to see why I would vote for Paul.I don't agree with all of Pauls or Obama's policies but defense spending and ending and not starting anymore wars is one of my top issues