You aren’t thinking this through and are now trying to throwing a bunch of nonsensical questions. you called her a DEI hire by claiming her published papers mean she isn’t qualified. I cited two fed governors who have no experience whatsoever. You don’t agree those two are unqualified but hold this black lady to a higher standard. Applying the law unequally to just your political opponents is the problem. Trump isn’t fighting mortgage fraud. He’s taking control of the fed. If you are MAGA you can get away with treason and be rewarded with 5mm in cash.
You aren’t thinking this through and are now trying to throwing a bunch of nonsensical questions. you called her a DEI hire by claiming her published papers mean she isn’t qualified. I cited two fed governors who have no experience whatsoever. You don’t agree those two are unqualified but hold this black lady to a higher standard. You are enabling his power grab so stop pretending that you are against it.
And you can also run the notorious internet drug den Silk Road and get a "get out jail" full/unconditional pardon for the right price too. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7e0jve875o
I did not look into other governors. Provide some details, then we can discuss. What I said about her I would say again if she was a white male or of any other gender or ethnicity or race or color, all else being equal. It is you who makes it about race not I. What I find frustrating with you, though, is your constant baiting about some "political opponents". Show me where I pledged allegiance to any political party or ideology. I try my utmost to debate issues, not ideologies or political parties. I might fail at times as we all do, but the attempt is there. Stop putting me into some ideological drawers. I don't care what Trump says or does, above and beyond what affects asset pricing. Neither do I care what Biden or Obama or Clinton says or does.
I already cited examples. You ignored them. If you aren’t supportive of this stuff then you are so stupid you fell for the plot hook line and sinker. the issue isn’t whether she did whatever. The issue is that you’ve been manipulated into thinking this is some ethical high ground action. That’s why he targeted a black woman. you first call her a DEI. You then say “it’s about the law” All the while saying you don’t approve of the power grab, but you really must. Because this truly isn’t about applying the law.
a) this is totally about applying the law (providing false information on mortgage applications, regardless of whether it's through proxies or intentional or unintentional) b) it's about whether someone is fit to serve as fed governor/director or not which assessment should be based on past education, published and peer reviewed papers, the quality and content of the research, and the past accomplishment that are directly linked to the job expectations and requirements). This thread is about her, if you care to open another thread to critique the accomplishments or questionable/criminal behavior of others then do so, if anyone is interested in participating, then they will. You seem to have issues to debate a specific issue, and you apparently have a chip on your shoulder and devulge in hostilities towards anyone who does not participate with you in politicizing every single issue. That's where we got to where we are today. Instead of tackling one issue after another two sides keep on screaming at each other and constantly deflect with "but your guy did that, your guy did much worse": OK fair so let's look into that other guy as well, but not let the initial person off the hook (it seems pretty clear to me that you have no interest whatsoever in looking into her behavior and her appointment and it seems pretty clear it is because of her skin color). What you are constantly doing is to excuse someone's appointment and behavior because others did worse. Yes others did worse and let's talk about it and call for action, but it does not change the fact that this individual here did what she did and how she was appointed and what she has done for the past many years instead of focusing on monetary policy.