RIMM halted why?

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by hajimow, Apr 28, 2011.

  1. This is getting rich, you're not.

    A company would not benefit from "forcing out stops". An ax would.

    A squeeze would be the opposite from forcing out LONG stops. An entity would only benefit by the theoretical "maximize shareholder value". Then again it might enable insiders to flip some options, but they're going to anyway.

    A news release is labeled such cuz...............it's released. Both content AND............... timing.

    Zero debt's good? IF an entity has a lucrative business model, one levers it. Of course there's a distinction between debt and leverage. We'll save unproductive cash (and burn) for another day.

    Back to the original post, a halt is to LOCATE shares, more than likely to hypothicate and short.
     
    #21     Apr 29, 2011

  2. Yes Landis, and with YOUR 8400 posts, you're indeed the ePITompe UV competence! No doubt YOUR parents have your potrait on their mantle. Or were you a bastard?
     
    #22     Apr 29, 2011
  3. olias

    olias

    well done

    I don't see much to get excited about for the future of RIM. I hated my last Blackberry phone FWIW
     
    #23     Apr 29, 2011