RIMM 3/1 split

Discussion in 'Options' started by insaneinvestor, Aug 14, 2007.

  1. Hmmm I must have a mental problem.
    After the split, the stock price goes down no? IE 762 to 260 or whatever I said above....

    So, therefor if you would please explain how, after the price goes down, I would not get more shares for the same amount of money by waiting.

    ( I am obviously missing something cause two people are telling me I am wrong...)

    After the split, the same amount of capital investment does not buy you a higher number of shares?

    -- I do like being in the boat though. even if I am in the "slow" section.

    :cool:
     
    #11     Aug 14, 2007
  2. spindr0

    spindr0

    You might want to check your math :)
     
    #12     Aug 14, 2007
  3. mde2004

    mde2004

    You show your ignorance each time you post about buying RIMM options for the split to make money, wtf are you smoking.
     
    #13     Aug 15, 2007
  4. spindr0

    spindr0

    Well, if you have a mental problem, at least you have a good attitude about it :)

    Let's say the stock is $210 and you buy 100 shares. Cost is $21,000. After the 3:1 split, you will have 300 shares at a cost basis of $70 per share which is the same $21,000. The split has no effect on the value of the position. Only the stock rising or falling does that.

    If you bought 33 shares now (pretend it's 33-1/3 so the math works out), your cost would be $7,000. After the split, you will own 100 shares @70 which is the same $7,000.

    The short answer? Buy the stock because you think it's going up, not because it's going to split.
     
    #14     Aug 15, 2007
  5. Exactly. The stock's reaction to the split, whether negative or positive, is for the most part based on short term speculation of the stock and the long term outlook of the company (combined with the overall state of the market). If you believed that a stock split would lead to a run-up in price, then why wouldn't everyone else be on the lookout for stock splits?

    If you were to obtain the total population of stocks that have split over the past few years and track their performance for a period of time after the split, I'm sure the confidence in your assumption would be waivering. At best, you'll be looking at a 50/50 possibility of walking out with a profit. Given those odds, I would just revert back to the dart-board method.
     
    #15     Aug 15, 2007
  6. I guess now we just wait and see.

    Thanks for the replies.
     
    #16     Aug 15, 2007
  7. Your wife! You should try some. It may do wonders for your attitude. :eek:
     
    #17     Aug 15, 2007
  8. spindr0

    spindr0

    Some years ago someone did a study of the results after stock splits.
    The results? It was rocket science stuff !! (g)

    Companies with good earnings went up and vice versa.

    The kiss of death? The reverse split... sort of like a step in the fabrication of wallpaper :)
     
    #18     Aug 15, 2007
  9. When I order a submarine sandwich I always ask them to cut it into three pieces. That way I get three times as much food for the same price.
     
    #19     Aug 15, 2007
  10. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I am here to learn jackasses. I see the error in my ways thanks to THIS board!

    Were you not ever a beginner?

    I love this place. There is a lot of love here. :)
     
    #20     Aug 15, 2007