Intersting timing of this study considering the San Bernadino tragedy which appears to be Islamic terrorism
We'll know if it was Islamic...or not. Depends on if the word goes out regarding how to report it from the powers that be.
I found this a bit jarring as well. Our resident fact checker piezoe snarked that they were grossly misleading etc. What is so misleading about recording someone's own words? Is there any doubt they are harvesting organs from aborted babies?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not ("Freddie"). You want to believe that is true. Ask Baron to prove I am in NJ posting. The only lie is Trump saying "thousands" he see celebrate.
Good points! A hen must prepare a setting combining with willingness and enough time in order to incubate her eggs. Not only her willingness involved is important, but also her feeling/attachment that is created/generated after a minimum time spent with the eggs for her desire wanting the eggs to become chicken. There should be a statistical data abut the psychology of a pregnancy regarding how much minimum/average time a potential mother would initially created/generated her feeling/attachment for the fertilized human egg. As a general guideline of standard time. There should be also a psychological test to confirm an individual's feeling/attachment before this standard time, to ensure sometimes reconsideration should be carefully made by a pregnant lady. Just 2 cents!
The problem isn't in the recording, it's in the editing that follows. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense." -- Buddha
I really want to understand this. What was so misleading? The things that shocked people was one, the fact that they were routinely harvesting organs from babies and getting paid for it, and two, the utter callousness with which they discussed the sordid business. One could imagine more moral anguish from guys running a junk yard and debating whether to part out a classic car. Of course you can edit a clip to make someone sound stupid, like the media did with Sarah Palin, or to impute views to them unfairly, but I fail to see how that applies here.
The media should have been given a prize for accomplishing the seemingly impossible, by making Sarah Palin appear to be even more stupid than she appears to be with no editing whatsoever. http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/19/politics/planned-parenthood-videos/ http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/ http://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...nthood-files-suit-against-group-behind-videos http://www.thenation.com/article/ho...renthood-videos-degraded-the-abortion-debate/