Validate your perceptions? That was never the topic. I asked you to validate your accusation that the user "Lucrum" is a racist and/or a KKK member. Since you have admitted that you can't in any way validate your accusation, that's pretty much all it is. An empty accusation- slander. I don't know why you feel the need to slander people with accusations you have no basis for. Perhaps you need to do some soul searching to figure out what makes you have such negative impulses?
1.he was being sarcastic,as he is most times 2.Wouldn't family,friends and associates be included in "Most everyone you know" ?
No, I am not accusing a moderator of anything. I am stating the fact that I didn't delete it, and you posted a false accusation. You do the math to reach your own conclusion...and if you want the to check your conclusion against the facts, then research the facts.
No, not if you're an unethical or immoral person. However, it's the moral and ethical obligation of people to substantiate their accusations. If you are going to attack someones character or make claims about them, then it's your obligation to substantiate those claims with facts. Otherwise it's slander and libel. If you can't back your claims up, you're just engaging in baseless defamation. Perhaps you should do some soul searching to help you understand why you feel a need to behave in such ways.
I have to substantiate my observations and conclusions to you? Am I the only one around here who has had similar observations and similar conclusions? That doesn't mean those with similar opinions and conclusions are necessarily right or wrong. It is an indicator. People can draw their own conclusions by doing the necessary research. Since I doubt you have read all the posts so many others have over time, and since I doubt your sincerity at finding the truth of a situation...having in this thread falsely accused me of something...something that has an easy and factual proof available to anyone...since I suspect you as being partisan over truth...I suspect that your motives are not about ethical or moral behavior. Am I accusing you of immoral and unethical behavior? If the shoe fits.. Sorry sonny, you just don't play the game well...
I'm not playing any "game". And yes, if you make accusations about someone then you are morally and ethnically obligated to substantiate them. You didn't present your accusations as "observations". You said that he was a racist and possibly a KKK member. You're the one who made the character attacks, you're the one who made the accusations, you need to validate them. That burden lies upon the accuser. I don't know if other people around here came to similar conclusions, it doesn't matter because they aren't making the accusation, you are. Whether or not I've read every post is also irrelevant. You've said that he's a racist, and perhaps a KKK member. Why? It's okay if you don't know the exact posts or the precise wording. How about just more or less? What did he say which makes him racist? What did he say that would imply that he's likely a KKK member? I'm not a grammar nazi with plans to hold you to exact wording. I'm just asking for basically, more or less, what makes Lucrum a racist? It has nothing to do with you, it has to do with Lucrum. The fact that you are trying to make this about you is a feature or narcissistic. Don't be immoral, and make baseless character attacks you can't validate. Simply tell us how Lucrum is a racist.