Richard Dawkins, Famed Atheist, Supports Free Bibles In Schools

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by Free Thinker, May 25, 2012.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    I saw a t-shirt once that said,

    1 + 1 > 2
    (for very large instances of 1)
     
    #211     Jun 18, 2012
  2. the catholic church has good reason not to allow modern testing. they know. what do you think they know?


    For three hundred years now, the Christian astronomer has known that his Diety didn't make the stars in those tremendous six days; but the Christian astronomer doesn't enlarge upon that detail. Neither does the priest.
    Samuel Clemens- Letters from the Earth
     
    #212     Jun 18, 2012
  3. stu

    stu

    Nearly right.
    You troll one truncated video like a demented bot and repeatedly confuse what is actually being said in one paper with something made up. You misrepresent scientists and science trying to infer a religious message that doesn't belong.
    Otherwise.... it's fair to say, you couldn't be more wrong in any case.
     
    #213     Jun 18, 2012
  4. stu

    stu

    I heard they don't sell that well.
     
    #214     Jun 18, 2012
  5. jem

    jem

    Truncated video... which is supported by Penrose's work on the subject.
    What troll b.s.... you cant show that video is out of context.
    I present definitive videos and papers on the subject and you troll.

    You state there is no appearance of fine tunings and that a Creator is not an option... I present to you one of the founders of string theory and the guy who wrote the book on string theory and the multiverse as an explanation for the fine tunings...

    ----

    Suskind states here are 4 possibilities to explain the knife's edge fine tuning...

    1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
    2. luck
    3. megaverse/ multiverse
    4. someday find a theory of everything.

    http://www.closertotruth.com/video-...d-Susskind-/431
     
    #215     Jun 18, 2012
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    I heard there's a stick up your butt.
     
    #216     Jun 18, 2012
  7. stu

    stu

    The video is truncated obviously to give the wrong impression.
    Penrose's work and what he is saying on the subject proposes a cyclic universe, explaining any questions of fine tuning.

    Susskind's book is sub titled "String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design". "(that is correct... susskind says it)"

    1. God
    has been declared an illusion by
    3. megaverse/ multiverse
    Trolling a list around won't change that .

    Using Susskind as your authority, you have to take into consideration everything he says, not just bits you want to hear that might fit with your own religious pre-conclusions. Once you do that, you may stop being such a prick.
     
    #217     Jun 19, 2012
  8. stu

    stu

    Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam from thine own ass.
     
    #218     Jun 19, 2012
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    Lol, you do have a sense of humor after all.
     
    #219     Jun 19, 2012
  10. jem

    jem

    you are such a troll.
    Penrose's work is consistent with the idea of incredible fine tuning.
    Penrose's work on the subject even calls bullshit on the multiverse explanation.
    He says the initial state is so special the multiverse can not even explain the fine tuning.

    do you know what 10 to the 10 to the 123 even represents.
    You are a complete fraud to suggest that video is not in context.
    I cited to the math in one of our previous threads.

    Suskind's video which I cited too numerous times on this thread states God is one of the 4 possible explanations for the fine tuning... one of the others is the multiverse. Susskind freely admits that... I can't figure out why you won't.


     
    #220     Jun 19, 2012