That's why reality can go further than fiction... Do you forget who wanted Irak's war, the first one with Clinton ? It was Sauda Arabia because Saddam is ANTI-ISLAM and that Saudi Arabia want the whole region to become fanatised by Islamism. So really what a joke to pretend that Saddam the ANTI-ISLAMIST would collide with the PRO-ISLAMIST Ben Laden haha !
Funny, you don't apply that same logic to the Bush administration over WMD and 9/11. Once again ART, you expose yourself as a hypocrite.
The problem is when Bush's administration controls and prevent the justice procedure it's difficult to do so...
The proof is that Bush and company claimed with certainty that WMD were there, and that was the reason given for urgent action. If someone makes a claim that evidence exists, yet there is no evidence, are they guilty of reporting false evidence? Yes. Did they do it intentionally? Perhaps yes, perhaps no. In any case, they are guilty of reporting false evidence. And who has been fired because of this false evidence leading the US into war?
You wanna the true reason: like Ben Laden Bush went to war because God ordered him hahaha : http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/...2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y "Abbas said that at Aqaba, Bush promised to speak with Sharon about the siege on Arafat. He said nobody can speak to or pressure Sharon except the Americans. According to Abbas, immediately thereafter Bush said: "God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them"
Running scared The Bush administration fears voters will believe Richard Clarke's allegations, writes Philip James Friday March 26, 2004 The swiftness and ferocity of the Bush White House's attack on Richard Clarke tells you two things: his story may be largely true, and the Bush administration is terrified that the American people will believe it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/comment/story/0,14259,1178658,00.html
*************************************** Maverick; Interesting because many journalism school teaches unbelief; & my read is the market proves to any one a certain amount of unbelief is profitable. Maverick74, i find that hard to believe you dont'' believe anything'' you read -how about your brokerge statement AFTER doublechecking buddy??????????????????????????????????????? Richard Clarke certainly was emotionaly moving with apology; but I dont believe him , like Maverick. Find Investors Business Daily NOTEBLY more accurate than most major media, especially in politics & business. Of course IBD isnt filled with Republican haters like most of media. Investors .com[powered by IBD] noted Clarkes credibility problem yesterday And ''Virtually all Clarkes negative comments have come in recent days as he flogged sales of his books.'' IBD 3-25 ========================================= Dont agree with most of Blair Hulls politics; but UNLIKE most of national news media I DONT hate one or lie or try to trash someone LIKE most in news business have done with people who differ.
==================================== Reason Bush made public for war include. 1, Protect Israel 2. WMD & who says they are not any; are youlike media, trying to justify you anti-war position????, Hussein used WMD on Iran, WMD on his own people. 3. Win War on terror ======================== The news media & Republicans threw a fit over his recent WMD joke;however someone in the media noted many in media laughed at it.