Rich and Taleb agree.....

Discussion in 'Trading' started by oddiduro, Nov 22, 2007.

  1. Infolode: A "trend" is what traders call directional price movement AFTER it has already appeared on the chart.

    Surf: Yes, the turtles apparently knew the truth, and traded accordingly. It is interesting that one of the most legendary trend traders would say that trading is largely hit and miss.

    Very, very instructive indeed.

    Best Regards
    Oddi
     
    #11     Nov 22, 2007
  2. Agreed, both Curtis Faith, an original turtle, and the other turtles interviewed by Covel agreed that most people will be unable to withstand the psychology of randomness.

    Most people cannot handle being wrong most of the time. They will revenge trade, change their rules, freeze, blame the market, blame the platform, blame the fed, blame the NWO, and quit.

    This the reason that most traders will fail. They have to be right, and in the world of trading, the need to be right and need to make money don't go well together.

    Best Regards
    Oddi
     
    #12     Nov 22, 2007
  3. Success is the best revenge. If you were given the bums rush they were afraid because your ideas instilled doubt in their already fearful minds.

    Perhaps my definition of a trend is different that the popular notion...I don't know, I'm 90% discretionary.

    As you say no one knows what the market will do and I'm no exception.

    If a trader gets stopped out on the third low he deserves to lose money.

    Stick with your beliefs if they make you money, that's part of the reason we do this day after day.
     
    #13     Nov 22, 2007
  4. Yeah, typing on the fly:D

    Please forgive me.

    Now back to the statement. Richard Dennis, the Turtle Jedi, says that trading is largely an accidental thing.

    Do you agree?

    Best Regards,
    Oddi
     
    #14     Nov 22, 2007
  5. Ok, I agree with everything you have stated yet I still trade mostly with the trend until I'm given conformation of a change. Then....I trade with that trend.
    Maybe this is a matter of semantics.:) I shouldn't get hung-up on the T word.:p
     
    #15     Nov 22, 2007
  6. Who in their right mind would suggest otherwise? I have yet to see a trend before the fact. :p

    Notwithstanding the significant random component, I suppose the Element XTM part is latching onto it in its "lower risk" areas, wherever they may be, and hoping for the best while preparing for the worst.
     
    #16     Nov 22, 2007
  7. I wouldn't say it's largely accidental because it requires skill and one trader will always have an edge over another trader if you isolated just 2 people but you have to have a strategy that includes the element of randomness. Any credible Financial Markets degreed program studies Stochastic Calculus rigorously. Why? The sharpest minds in the business realize the markets absolutely are random!

    If you want to succeed in this business you have to have a firm grasp of the following concepts: statistics, probability, and randomness. And, you have to be willing to study the markets to the extent that a doctor studies medicine. A 2-week seminar just won't cut it. You need to study for years and years, and then be willing to learn more every single day. This isn't a job for the lazy, casual, or inept. It needs to be a passion that only leaves you when you drift off at night, if it even leaves you then.

     
    #17     Nov 22, 2007
  8. rwk

    rwk

    I don't think randomness is what Dennis meant by trial and error. He had done enough testing to know that he had an edge and that he would make money through the systematic application of that edge. He meant that making money on any particular trade was not magic. The outcome is determined by probabilities.

    I don't think Taleb believes markets are random either. He says that markets are unpredictable, and that using a Gaussian distribution as a model for price behavior is a seriously flawed strategy.

    I don't think either Dennis nor Taleb would expect a strategy of following price and hoping to have much success.

    [rwk]
     
    #18     Nov 22, 2007
  9. "...using a Gaussian distribution as a model for price behavior is a seriously flawed strategy."

    agreed
     
    #19     Nov 22, 2007
  10. Great insights here. The markets are not normal but there are periods of normalcy throughout the day. If you can isolate the data when it is in the tails the probability that you'll win sky rockets. You have to be very quick to realize when your analysis is flawed, however.

    "I don't think either Dennis nor Taleb would expect a strategy of following price and hoping to have much success."--------->>> A price following strategy is flawed. Buy what others are selling and sell what others are buying, but only do this when prices have traveled to extreme values (statistics). This happens every single day.

     
    #20     Nov 22, 2007