Reverse Iron Condors

Discussion in 'Options' started by jkgraham, Mar 7, 2012.

  1. spindr0

    spindr0

    Long option positions for EAs are another crapshoot. If you want to play earnings in a lower risk fashion, look into ways of selling near term high IV and buying out month lower IV. OTOH, if out month is highly elevated, consider reverse calendars (G,D,R).
     
    #81     Mar 11, 2012
  2. A 90% probability of hitting better than 30% every four months in a short condor? Let's bet your net liq on that. We'll need a total of ten four-month cycles. I can wait. I'll take the other side of each condor and we can prop-bet on which produces the greatest lookback return (peak historical profitability (peak to trough)).

    PM me if interested because I am (interested).

    Re: the vernacular. Always refer to the natural (not the combo) when naming a position. You can build a condor with calls, puts or a combination of both. In this case the natural is the call OR put condor. You're either long or short. This thread is concerned with a short natural condor. Why, wtf knows.

    Long a call condor = long the put condor: debit req (or it's arbitrage)

    Always refer the the natural when naming. Short body/long wings is a long condor due to equivalence. Now why is this thread obsessed with one-side of the coin?
     
    #82     Mar 11, 2012
  3. Nope, you're wrong spindr0. You CAN assign probabilities.

    I mean, have you ever used ThinkOrSwim's ANALYZE tab that gives the probability of expiring OTM and prob of touching a particular strike? It also gives max profit, max loss and those probabilities.

    It uses a normal distribution to do so- very quantitative!
     
    #83     Mar 11, 2012
  4. spindr0

    spindr0

    I'd respond in detail but given that you have no concept of how an apple is different than an orange, you're coconuts.
     
    #84     Mar 11, 2012
  5. opt789

    opt789

    That is funny if you are being facetious. If you are serious, then you have a long way to go.
     
    #85     Mar 11, 2012
  6. donnap

    donnap

    Methinks the latter.
     
    #86     Mar 11, 2012

  7. :confused:
     
    #87     Mar 11, 2012
  8. Spindr0 totally misunderstood Opt789's post, and as it gets re-quoted it loses even more meaning. I suggest you go back and read the threads, you should be able to find the mix-up.
     
    #88     Mar 11, 2012
  9. Wow, I can't believe how my feeble attempts at a joke have gone past so many...

    Understanding sarcasm is difficult I guess
     
    #90     Mar 11, 2012