so now that I tore your fairy tale world apart by explaining to you how your leaders admit agw models were wrong... you are over here acting like a sock puppet.
Quote from futurecurrents: Is there even any reason to read jem's posts anymore? ------------- As I discovered months ago, there is no reason to read any of your posts, FC, now or ever. Just trying to be helpful.
No you were just pissing in the corner while talking to yourself again. Nothing you ever say has any substantive truth.
1. when I told you that there had been no statistical warming for the last 16 years...remember you called all sorts of names -- but was I telling you the truth? 2. When I told you that throughout the ice core history... temperature has lead the accumulation and dissipation of CO2 was I lying or telling you the truth. So I challenge you to shut up...or a. show were I lied about something I presented as fact... b. go find one of your experts studies and show us how they have proven man made CO2 has caused temperatures to rise here on earth. If you are going to use a model... make sure it is not one of those models which correctly forecasted no statistically warming the last 16 years.
Right, and all those things have no substantive meaningful truth to them. They change nothing about the overwhelming truth of AGW. They are sideshows at best. Red herrings. Diversions and distractions from the more profound reality. Trivial crap. Pissing in the corner.
There has been no statistical warming for 16 years... the only thing you could rely on to tell us man made CO2 was causing warming were models. Your models failed in that they predicted a rise in temp which did not happen. You call that nothing? I tell you nothing... you have absolutely nothing (valid) showing us that man made CO2 causes warming here on earth.
Quote from futurecurrents: Pissing in the corner. -------- Unlike pissing into the wind like you are doing! Honest facts do not support your position.
You said it. No doubt it was by mistake, but you said it. "fine tuning of our universe".... is conjecture. Well done! Top down cosmology is a (scientific) theory. No kiddin'. Well fancy. That's another one hell of a non-argument you have there.