Meh, never been impressed with her political savviness, I'm sure she'll wait until Ginsburg croaks and McConnell fast tracks another swamp creature before reality hits home
I know you are not stupid or delusional. I don’t even think you are being intentionally dishonest or even manipulative. You are, however, being intellectually lazy. Trump was elected President according to US laws. Although the Russia Collusion investigation tried to show otherwise, it failed. Agreed? Now the “Politics before country” Democrats are hoping to find some technicality because they are afraid of facing Trump at the polls again? The Democrats are sh*t, and deep down inside, you know it. Trump is Sh*t, and we don’t have to look deep to figure that out. However, Trump’s platform and leadership are significantly better than what the Democrats have to offer. Let’s face it, our political parties do not attract the best and the brightest, do they?
Actually, I think that has the makings of a great question in the campaign debates. Ask each candidate why they think our election campaign process clearly does not attract the best and the brightest.
Read the article and not just the headline. You will see the basis upon which the prosecutors would have indicted Trump.
Even so, understand that she's not just juggling Trump's balls. Whereas you are focusing on a singular objective, her role is multifaceted and fairly complex. At least give her that.
Of course not. "A" students go into science/medicine. "B" students to into business. "C" students go into politics. Only the most egregiously greedy and power hungry in politics lie enough to get elected. (Ain't rocket science, but isn't it amazing how American politics seem to elect the scummiest of the scum to be our political leaders and make policy for all of us?? Just consider the list of DemoCrap politico elites... plus GWB.... COULD THERE BE A BIGGER PILE OF SHIT??)
I read the article. It said “obstruction”, but it did not provide specifics. The devil is in the details. You are a child molester and my friends, some them prominent, agree with me. This false accusation, in of itself, means nothing. Now if an law enforcement officer or teacher were to say: “Irene Littletums, an 8 year old female stated that in the morning of 3-31-2019, a male that goes by the handle of Frederick Foresight on a social media site, Elitetrader.com did look purposely look up her dress by bending over without her consent and said ‘Nice A**’ at Plainville Elementary school playgrounds in Wherever, ME that would have a little bite to it, wouldn’t it? Sure, Irene could have been coached and is making it all up at the request of a third party. However, the effect of this false accusation has all the effects a real does, at least in the early stages. How would you feel if someone had a political vendetta against you and this got reported in the media before you had a chance to respond. You effectively get tried and convicted by the media and your reputation suffers outside of your close friends and family until you can clear yourself, which would probably take at least a few court appearances. If you are a politician, you are effectively shut down, aren’t you? Are you beginning to see why I’m such a stickler for specific details? The above scenario has happened before. Ask Kavanaugh, except a certain decision maker had the balls to call “Bullsh*t” and push his nomination through. The Democratic leadership’s political philosophy has evolved outside what most voters want. These power hungry politicians know they do not have the informed consent of many voters. In order for these politicians to bridge the gap requires them tearing down the other side through any means possible.