Republican wants WH candidates to prove citizenship

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jficquette, Mar 15, 2009.

  1. Very well said.

    But because ET attracts incredibly bankrupt intellectual posters such as the Mercor's, Jfiquette's, and NeoRio's of the world, this type of most basic logic escapes them.

    The Clinton's are some of the most power hungry politicians of the modern era. For them to not even begin to "exploit" Obama's citizenship speaks volumes.

    But not surprisingly, people on ET continue to question the President's citizenship ( and why the Supreme Court didn't even waste their time on "hearing" it ) because ET is filled with "deaf, dumb, and blind" people.

    :D
     
    #11     Mar 15, 2009
  2. I Agreed Brother
     
    #12     Mar 15, 2009
  3. The fact that the supreme court would not hear the case,
    settles the matter. However, there have been reports coming
    out about dissension within the Armed Forces on this matter
    since they are sworn to uphold the constitution.

    Since i am not qualified, anyone care to comment?
     
    #13     Mar 16, 2009
  4. Lets say for a second that Obama was born in Hawaii and had a real live birth certificate proving it.

    If that were the case Obama was dumb for not using during the election to make the Republicans look bad for doubting him.

    So who was dumber? The Clintons or Obama?
     
    #14     Mar 16, 2009
  5. Obama just does not feel like he must show his birth certificate to any republican blowhard who wants it. That is what some people don't get it. YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SEE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR TO DEMAND TO SEE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE. Now get over it. Obama got elected, so any doubting by the republicans on this issue has been "needless worry".

    This matter is SETTLED AS A MATTER OF LAW. Supreme Court by not looking at the case spoke loudly on the issue.
     
    #15     Mar 16, 2009
  6. Thats bullshit and you know it. lol
     
    #16     Mar 16, 2009
  7. Really? Don't you know that courts by refusing to look at a case affirm existing rulings of lower courts?

    Get a brain, honestly.
     
    #17     Mar 16, 2009