And you as a Trump supporter has credibility to evaluate someone's ability? LOL 1. Nobody said that's science. Consensus is how science operates using a process of peer review. 2. That's not even wrong, it's not even a sentence - try to put 'climate change' in there to make it readable.
If it's settled science then link me to a peer reviewed report that states approximately how much of the warming is due to man made sources and how much is due to natural sources.
Of course this is what the anti science hysterical climate change antifa don’t have an answer to. The climate is always changing. It’s currently not changing outside of natural variation in any causal relation to the amount of ANthropogenic CO2 being released. The fear mongers have no science on their side. They only have tax hikes.
All of the world's relevant science orgs and experts say stuff like this.... American Meteorological Society "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." of course you are free to say what you want. And we are free to mock your ignorance and stupidity aint America great?
American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4 American Geophysical Union "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5 American Meteorological Society "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7 American Physical Society "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8 The Geological Society of America "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9 SCIENCE ACADEMIES International academies: Joint statement "Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10 U.S. National Academy of Sciences "The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11
Once again you offer no evidence and all you do is re-post the same logos for the 200th time despite regularly told by moderators that this is an abuse of the forum and you need to stop.
Yes, listing scientific organizations is abuse, if only he posted a fake paper from a random wordpress blog cited by Breitbart then he would be a real conservative scientist worth worshipping.