You have no fact to support your fears...typical for the right wing. Look, we can always go back in if necessary...we are real good with the invasion/overthrow stuff.
Maybe Hillary can do another cork screw landing under sniper fire and get all our troops out, uh zzzzzzz? Your girl isn't looking too good right now.
Hillary never looked good... Then again, Abe Lincoln wasn't a handsome fellow... Anyway, the right wingers including yourself are quite confused speaking out of both sides of your pieholes... If you are right, if we announce our departure date, the resistance to the US occupation won't be offering up any sniper fire...as they will just wait until we leave and then attack the Iraqis... Get this...they want us to leave. So do most of the Iraqi people... "BAGHDAD, Sept. 26 -- A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601721.html So do most of the American people, they want us to leave... Which leaves your moron petulant stubborn fuck Bush who doesn't care what the people of America or the people of Iraq want...
Aren't you the same moonbat troll who claims to have a close relationship with God, and who pretends to care for all people of the earth, fallen souls and all? In that case, why on earth would you support a policy of withdrawal that would result in genocide in Iraq? How can you honestly sit in your dark cave and not realize that if we pull out, Iraq totally goes to shit and millions could die? What evidence do you have that indicates the Iraqi security forces could compensate for us leaving and prevent the entire country from turning on one another? You're the kind of buffoon who probably thought something like Rwanda could never happen. You have the mindset of Neville Chamberlain, but you're far more stupid. The pacifist troll, whose principle of non-violence is more important than reality.
"BAGHDAD, Sept. 26 -- A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601721.html [/B][/QUOTE] This is based on polling the populace. Virtually every military analyst says civil war if the US unilaterally pulls out. Shiites would undoubtedly win this with the aid of Iran and superior numbers (after genocide on a very scary scale). Imagine the regime that would be there then? I do not support this occupation by the US in any way, but now that the US is there, just cutting losses and leaving would be absolute disaster.
Sorry, had the urge to post this here as well. Neither moonbat nor neocon, the whole iraq situation was and is a total nightmare. Keep in mind that the tens of thousands we were told were killed by Saddam, were mostly those who were promised continued support iraq number one, desert storm. Bush sr, who I like. We had a reason to do what we did back then, and we had a good reason to stay and help those who actually supported the US against Saddam. We left, they were hunted down. Was Saddam a bad guy, sure, but he was contained and we had no reason to attack iraq this time around. Afghanistan, sure, and yes let's tracke down bin-laden and al-quaeda, but there is no way in hell that the invasion of iraq will ever be looked up as anything but the stupidest blunder by the US in history. The right brings up the fact that we're still in Germany, Japan, and other places. Well, these countries are allies now, iraq will never be. And, Saddam was adamantly against Iran and al-quaeda. So we destroy his standing army and wonder why the iraqi's can't defend themselves, another smart move. However, I don't buy into the tax cuts being a bad thing. Taxes are generally bad in every case. We have too much government, and it's grown tremendously over the last decade. c
Well written post. When your emotions fly you're persuasive and fluid. I hope you understand now the point of my Hitler threads. If a socialist like FDR kills millions of commie fighting Germans and Japs and takes down half a million Americans as well then war is good. If a tax cutting, pro life Republican goes to war freeing people from a despot then war is bad. I'm consistant. I wouldn't have removed Saddam nor would I have fought in Europe. Either time. But most Leftists are only pacifists during those RARE times that it's a Republican at war.
I see your point, but I utterly disagree with you about not taking action in Europe. Let Hitler roam unfettered? Lunacy IMO. BTW, I take umbrage with your usage of the term "Japs." Very distasteful. You used the term Germans, why couldn't you say Japanese? You're not the biggest fan of black people, but I don't see you using the N-word to describe them, after all. And the Zzztroll is not a Leftist per se. It is a mishmash of belief systems, many of which contradict each other. It is a confused and pathetic entity, schizophrenic on many levels. At the end of the day, I don't think even it understands what its core beliefs are, other than to try to "argue" via endless obfuscation, evasion, and ad hominem while simultaneously reeking of hypocrisy.