Futurecurrents was merely referring to his own personal experience as a point of reference. What are you referring to, aside from your overriding and ongoing narrative? Do you have a larger, more relevant sample you can point to that invalidates? Or are you just talking out of your sphincter? Yet again.
I hear most of you...uh...guys are obsessed with other mens sphincters. Oh, and I have read a statistics book.
There is no point in wasting expensive education on stupid people as in, according to YOU, they will still graduate - stupid.
The obvious, which of course you and futurecurrent couldn't see/wouldn't admit even if someone shoved it up your crooked pointy nose.
Do you get the feeling that we're trying to teach pigs to dance? It's too bad there so few intelligent conservatives to debate.
This from the ignoranus who can't even understand a dumbed-down program on the Science Channel http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3473280#post3473280
Bullshit. I just saw this post now. You made those representations 2 years ago: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...ghlight=thousands+of+trades+a+day#post2703765 You never backed off that statement in a bizarre effort to justify your knowledge of macroeconomics with your daytrading. And now we see it was just one of those quirky things. And THIS is what you used to justify your "knowledge" of macroeconomics? Idiot.
Too funny , according to you an intelligent conservative consists only of those liberals not quite as looney tunes as you.