republican congress deregulating securities laws. scammers dream come true.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Free Thinker, Apr 5, 2012.

  1. Ex-Con Man Says JOBS Law Makes Guys Like Him Rich

    Though the JOBS Act was packaged as a plan to streamline rules to help small companies crank out jobs, even its cheerleaders have come up with scant evidence the law will boost employment much, if at all. In an election year when pragmatic politicians are laboring to come off as allies of deep-pocketed business donors, the JOBS Act is a slapdash attempt at securities-law deregulation, plain and simple.

    Discovering Gems
    The new law has 22 pages of gems that include new ways for securities analysts to tout their firms’ public offerings, and cool opportunities to avoid rules that force companies to supply audited financial statements. In the end, though, the law that Morze tags as having “real potential for abuse” boils down to two features that don’t bode well for small investors: It lets a lot of companies reveal less about themselves when they sell stock, and, for the first time, it lets companies flog their shares on the Internet.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-04/ex-con-man-says-jobs-law-makes-guys-like-him-rich.html
     
  2. Brass

    Brass

    What is the sound of one Invisible Hand clapping?
     
  3. Well obviously it's the same sound as a visible hand clapping, but you are not too bright so I had to point that out to you.

    consider it my gift to you for the day
     
  4. Brass

    Brass

    Too stupid to understand the reference, are you? But certainly arrogant enough to go with that stupidity.
     
  5. I fully understand the reference , I merely pointed out your obvious stupidity.
     
  6. Brass

    Brass

    If you understood the reference at the time you wrote your previous post, you would not have actually written it. Too bad you posted first and then Googled afterwards. (What was that remark about stupidity?)
     
  7. Don't you ever get tired of making a fool out of yourself?

    I answered you correctly, no google required.
     
  8. They do a lot of that:D :D
     
  9. So there is still no need to take PT off of ignore I see.
     
  10. You guys are too funny
    Yes keep me on ignore since you cannot handle getting owned by me like I owned brASS on this thread.
     
    #10     Apr 5, 2012