You are calling it factual, I clearly communicated this is my sincere belief. Dumb cunt you are You will burn I'm sure fella. Maybe me too but you for sure.
Yeah but I 'named that firm' didn't I? Think he runs that by himself? -never argue with the great and all knowing VZ.
blahahahahahahahahahaha https://www.dailywire.com/news/mit-...d-the-visibility-of-hunter-biden-laptop-story MIT: Twitter Ban ‘Nearly Doubled’ The Visibility Of Hunter Biden Laptop Story
Maybe nobody wanted the byline because all of the shit that would come their way, especially if the knew the story was accurate.
So the solution is to assign byline to people who didn't contribute to the story and didn't knew that they were attributed? Why won't anyone want credit for an accurate story?
I told you why! They don't want to deal with people like you or worse. When a reporter comes up with a Trump story, true or not, they are built up and literally worshipped. Story reported on Biden, they are called propagandists, shills, liars, Russian stooges
People like me who would want to read the actual emails instead of a screenshot made in photoshop? At least with wikileaks, they dumped all the emails, Ghouliani and NYPost won't even do that, won't even let AP take a look at the emails. Why? All depends on reputation of the news outlet, NYPost is a tabloid who consistently get stories wrong. Ghouliani admitted to working with Russian spies and he gave the 'laptop' to NYpost who refuse to show it to anyone else to verify, why won't the story be suspect? Even Fox News refused to touch it.
Man, I hope Alphabet Inc is making a shitton of money from all this silly (Through the Google searching). It is comically sad at this point.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what 'moving averages' are. You threw me on that one. Is that a stock thing?
I saw a chart you posted, looked like something you screenshotted from some web based charting app. That's a dead give away of one's trading skills.