The word I would chose to use is undelusioned. Anyway, I am not going to debate you. This is simple, we have a guy who claims to be able to trade using some sort of remote viewing into the future, so just start a journal and post the viewing results. What could be simpler? go view tomorrow's DOW close and post the number. It's just a number, no vague semantical information or statistical interpretation... I bet he won't. It's pretty funny that 'the best thread ever' has been moved to shit chat
"Undelusioned" is rather presumptuous given personal experience doesn't extend to others, or to the unknown. About the remote viewing/trading claims, I agree about the journal.
I am very interested in the idea of a remote viewing journal, to the poster who claims he can predict the future will you start such a journal ?
Yes, I think there is enough interest (2000+ page views in a day!) to make it stay relevant to trading. If you restart as your personal journal at least you can have some control over the topic. Whether this is a successful way to trade remains to be seen but it is a valid topic that most everyone agrees there is something to even if we can't agree on whether it is good or bad.
Anyone can do this, it isn't a "gift." It is a skill executed through a rigorous protocol. Funny how Vag can't grasp basic statistics.
Then do it douchebag, give us a remote viewing journal. Funny how you can't grasp something as easy as that. Hell, all you have to do is turn your own computer on and view it later in time. Statisical my ass, there is nothing statistical about viewing a number such as tomorrow's DOW close and putting into a journal entry. Funny how you have to resort to 'statisical' arguments to support something that you claim is so obvious.
Vag88, That is what unsuccessfull people do...attempt to bully those who are successful. It is a defense mechanism for your inferiority. Science is still waiting for your commitment to progress.