Religion is a hypothesis.

Again, you miss the point. I'll explain my crazy ass idea just as soon as you explain yours to me...and we'll both be wrong.

 

what point? what's your point? i don't want to hear your crazy backazz woods butt-f^ck idea i want to hear smthg intelligible

 

Try as I might, I don't see anything in here about "something out of nothing":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang

 

Such backdoor pretension.

 

Well, if it's posted on wiki then it must be true. Yes, I've read it too. Perhaps you missed this part.

Without any evidence associated with the earliest instant of the expansion, the Big Bang theory cannot and does not provide any explanation for such an initial condition; rather, it describes and explains the general evolution of the Universe since that instant.

How convenient!

 

777 has a lot of handles on here, some obvious some not so obvious. word to admin.. he has a hotbrick you know

 

The truth is always convenient for those who don't fear it.

So your complaint really is that science is incomplete. Agreed, science doesn't have an answer for every question.

And theism does?

 

Actually, theism does. It just doesn't have the predictive, ie. practical power that science does.

 

Please differentiate your "opinions vs beliefs" sounds like BS to me.

 

You don't even believe in your own opinions?

LOL!!!