Religion is a hypothesis.

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by walter4, Nov 29, 2009.

  1. "Something apparently exploded. You know, like a bomb."

    LMAO...

    Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat...

    Bwaaahaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaa....


     
    #191     Dec 2, 2009
  2. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    That's hilarious, the idea that your superstition precedes morality. There are examples of morality in the animal kingdom. I saw a film clip of a hippo chasing off a crocodile that had attacked an impala. Tell me, at what temple did the hippopotamus worship? :D :D
     
    #192     Dec 2, 2009
  3. So you consider that Hippo to be a moral being?? What temple have you been too?
     
    #193     Dec 2, 2009
  4. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Look at this!


    <!--[if !supportLists]-->- <!--[endif]-->Wolves depend on teamwork to bring down large prey such as caribou or moose;


    <!--[if !supportLists]-->- <!--[endif]-->African wild dogs will carry fresh meat back for the “babysitters” who stayed at home with the cubs during the hunt;


    <!--[if !supportLists]-->- <!--[endif]-->Harris hawks live in groups with well-defined divisions of labor: certain hawks have the role of rearing and protecting the young, while others never visit the nest but do the hunting and share their food;


    <!--[if !supportLists]-->- <!--[endif]-->Dolphins will try to save companions trapped in tuna nets, and one or more dolphins will work together to help a sick or injured dolphin stay close to the surface to prevent it from drowning;


    <!--[if !supportLists]-->- <!--[endif]-->Vampire bats that have had a successful night on the town demonstrate an altruism of sorts by regurgitating blood for companions that have been less successful. (Reciprocal altruism, however, is the rule—for a bat that fails to share will in turn be denied when the tables are turned.)
     
    #194     Dec 2, 2009
  5. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    +1

    Some theists can't conceive of morality without a threat/reward component like a god smiling or frowning at various mortal behavior.
     
    #195     Dec 2, 2009
  6. stu

    stu

    You describe a Creator as unknowable but you know It does not exist in a Universe such as this one, and you know It is not a personality, and you know It created and orders the Universe. So that Creator is not actually unknowable, as you know things about It. This is getting like no belief is belief .

    If it is illogical to think the Universe just happened as you say, it is equally illogical to think a Creator just happened. And a Creator which has always existed, begs the question then why wouldn’t the Universe have always existed.

    When arguing the Universe needed to be created, you have no logical grounds to argue why a Creator wouldn’t need to be created.

    From the explanation you give it is a little obvious that the "organizing force that created and orders the Universe" , a Creator, fits the role of the Universe itself.
     
    #196     Dec 3, 2009
  7. :D Too damn funny for words.
     
    #197     Dec 3, 2009
  8. stu

    stu

    what was your point again …oh yea , that’s right , you don't have one [​IMG]
     
    #198     Dec 3, 2009
  9. Nice argument for intelligent design amongst reinventing Hinduism and Buddhism amongst others.

    Like I said you fools are too funny for words.
     
    #199     Dec 3, 2009
  10. Thanks for deflating the big bang theory as relevant or accurate.

    Or do you still prefer the old " magical something came out of nothing " schtick?
     
    #200     Dec 3, 2009