the topic is analysis. If you don't get that why don't you just moderate the chit chat thread, where they don't care about anything. otherwise, we can carry on a conversation about analysis without any moderation, since you don't even know what we are talking about anyway.
No, no, Oldtime! My missnake entirely! Henceforth I shall label this pane of my chart "Chitchatting." I have only been using it about six months now, so I am not stuck on "Meeming." Poor old blue NQ has a love-hate relation with his high-yeller MeeMaw. Can't get away from her too soon and can't get back to her too fast!
tha't cool, let's go underground, can I still get tickets to the lectures on the chit chat froum? also, do you have a website where I can sell lawnchairs? I put on an FWAP trade and a whole fucking container ship crashed on an island I own, and it was full of lawn chairs. Still have some differences with you on volume versus price, but, the moderators are kinding of cracking down on that kind of stuff. But before they shut us down, could you explain VWAP one more time?
oh right, I should have clarified, the contaner ship was just normal, but the island was filled with lawn chairs (we were expecting a lecture) so I am just waiting for the insurance settlement. So I figure we can sell them at a premium if we can prove the container ship damaged them intentionally. You were thinking about giving a lecture on my island , weren't you? for like 50% of the settlement?
Funny you should ask about VWAP. I almost shit my pants reading the posts in current VWAP thread. VWAP is most simply defined as "the average price of every individual share or contract traded during the specified period." As to volume and price, both sides are right. Sometimes price spawns volume. And sometimes volume breeds price. But I still maintain that neither con-dition can be espied except on nagual charts. Tonal charts do not reveal it, as the pheronomenon is fleetingly quantumly evanescent. WRT PWAV, I will show you an example of its validitty if and when one randomly occurs.
I believe that there is fetal flaw in your business model. Ass-piring traders do not want to pay for trading humor. And why should they, since they can get it here for free? I once approached TradersExpo asking for a slot for a free seminar titled "Professor Joe Doaks' TA for the New Millenium." Apparently my reputation preceded me. I had so many new indicators I wanted to share with them, leading off with Liberace Ratios. I have more dumb ideas in my backtesting repertoire than I would care to admit.
you under estimate the youth of your audience. If they are too old this year, they will be young enough in the years to come. Sounds like your theories have just gotten a little ahead of themselves. It takes a while for fresh new traders to accept a new idea. I can't comment on your price studies, since they are well above and beyond what my staff can analyse at this time (due to government cutbacks in our study program) but if your VWAP predictions prove accurate under our rigorous testing, I'm prettty sure you will see additional testing for WPAP. After all, we do have a say in the management of the Endowment Fund, and if I do say so myself, they are quite pleased with the results of our backtesting. Don't mean to be critical, but IMHO, the Stockton lectures were a little more illuminating than the Sacramento lectures, but that may have just been due to the receptivity of the crowd in attendance. Already have tickets to the 8'oclock show at Contra Costa, let me know about the lawn chairs.