ok, prove it. that's all it comes down to buddy. but you cannot and never will. and even worse, all the evidence we have says that he is a complete fabrication! so suck on that!
The concept of omniscience is not at all "logically impossible," and was never shown to be so as you claimed. In fact, concepts from philosophy and logic help to prove that the concept cannot be discredited by semantic games!
It depends on your definition. But since you assert these "concepts" exist, why dont you tell us about some of them instead of simply asserting they exist and therefore daniel is wrong. Until then...just another empty assertion. peace axeman
Very limited? By who's measure? If a snail were capable, I bet it would think our ability to understand the objective universe it quite grand Are you aware of some superior beings hiding somewhere that are more capable than we are of understanding the universe? Why jump to such conclusions? Your are obviously guessing. I personally have no idea of how capable we are of understanding the objective universe. But I have not observed any entities that are more capable than man. I'm getting really tired of all these empty assertions. It amazes me how frequently and easily people throw out claims with nothing to back them up. peace axeman