Regarding the Debate

A Valid Perspective

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GX14g_uLkrc?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GX14g_uLkrc?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

 

That's news to me, but the only one I'm really concerned about is the democrat in the WH NOW.

If they really opposed it why didn't they abolish this stuff when they had the WH and congress in their back pocket. I'll answer for you, they're not opposed.

And yet the poll/facts I posted dramatically say otherwise.

 

Dude, go back to class. You need to make a distinction here between democratic "voters" and democratic "officials". I'll give you the fact that many on the left support these things as voters, but almost none of your elected democratic officials do.

 

Maybe you should go back to class.I thought it was clear that I was arguing that some democratic voters would support Paul,not democratic officials

 

Some of them would, just under 10% of them.

 

Yes but your statement reflected what you thought demcorats were doing. And my point was that is not what they have done over the last 100 years.

 

1.So are democratic voters.We want the wars to end but no republicans other then Paul is promising to immediately end the wars so its not like the anti war voters would consider any republican but Paul.Democratic voters also know that it was a republican who started the wars

When I said I knew Obama was a warmonger,I was referring to after he became president.


2.Democratic voters are against the patriot act etc,but politicians don't always do what the voters who voted them into office wants them to do


3.Your poll is flawed.A democrat can be considered a libertarian or independent.You consider me a democrat,yet I just told you I would vote for Paul over Obama

 

100 years is to far.Clinton,Carter and JFK were more anti war,fiscally responsible and socially liberal then republican presidents of the past 50 years

 

This simply isn't true.

 

What other democratic ET posters have said that? I'm honestly curious here.