Under Roe it was virtually impossible to get a 3rd trimester abortion.....so it forced a decision to be made early on....... Now many states will allow abortion on demand for any reason.......look for more 3rd trimester abortions
Why are you implying I am a democrat? I am an independent thinker. I am registered as an unaffiliated voter on the voting rolls. I feel so sorry for you that no matter how hard you try, your little tiny brain cells cannot figure out how to fit me into the little box you wish to. Aww, so sad!
Yes, it was "virtually impossible", hence the less than 1% occurrence rate. There is no logical reason for that to change, women don't want third trimester abortions except in extraordinary circumstances, because when they get that far they've clearly made the decision they want the baby. Shooting down Roe is about low-faith, christian male control, little more. "If we can make everyone a christian, our own christianity is more comforting."
Morthole, you are an independent thinker? You are, perhaps, the biggest moron on this site. Literally everything you post turns out to be wrong.
Let's face it, if doctors performed abortions with an AR-15, not one Republican would want to ban it.
A.B. Stoddard: “A raped and pregnant 10-year-old crossing state lines for an abortion. A coup against our government led by a president eager to send a mob he knew was armed to threaten the vice president and members of Congress. A Supreme Court that rules against the majority of the country on guns, abortion, and climate change and may side with Republicans next year who want partisans to decide our elections. The attorney general of Texas admitting he would welcome the return of anti-sodomy laws.” “After years of tumultuous change and accelerating division, these past days and weeks have made perfectly clear—even to those who had tried tuning it all out when Donald Trump lost the 2020 election—just what Republicans do with power.”
And since 1789, it was understood that if a right isn't explicitly spelled out in the Constitution that doesn't mean that the people therefore didn't retain such a right. The right to travel, for example, is NOT in the Constitution. I assume most of us would balk if our home state passed a law criminalizing travel to other states in the Union. However, it looks like some red states are about to attempt to ban interstate travel if the purpose of that travel is the procuring a legal abortion in state that is not medieval in its outlook. This SCOTUS may well decide that states can ban the interstate travel of its citizens. I will not be surprised if it does. But if SCOTUS does agree to allow states to ban travel, it will probably do so narrowly, at first, for the essentially arbitrary case of procuring abortion while it will allow one to travel out of state if it is for the purpose of murdering anyone protesting racial injustice. But it is only a small step from there to banning it for any reason whatsoever one can concoct.