I don't know if you are full of shit or not, but since it is so much work to try to decipher what you post, you'll have to forgive me for going with the odds that you belong in the default 95% losers category. In which case I refer you to the first post of this thread for a lesser losing method. If you ever manage to simplify your statements, and have something semi-objective to contribute (like the above semi-understandable 8 year old method), you will be welcomed back.
As you know I have sevral programming adjuncts to the ET server system. One is my early detection of posts related to me. As has happened I post reponses to them (Magna and Don Bright for example) even though they have been deleted. I also can select a member who has me on ignore and remove the ignore status if something in my automated profile of him has a corrolation of greater than 83.78% to four significant figures. I do this when a post I make is pertinent to his profile. I checked my correlation log which has little activity in third quarter reporting periods. My hacking appearatus, mistakenly removed me from your ignore list; I am back on ignore on your list. Sorry.
If you let it mature for a while; you will discover that it is a good place to plant some seeds in. The reason for monitoring adjacent fractals (as defined by a faster fractal allowing one level of finer observation to come into view) is embedded in the single principle used in the eight year old game. Adjacent fractals show the market bias for the next faster trading fractal. To flip a coin (50-50) to trade only dominant fractals is a logic based deduction and NOT an induction based odds gaming situation. I have no personal interest in whether anyone understands the facts and ideas I have presented. Of course, everyone wants to help others, that is de facto too. Horses do not drink water at every opportunity they are given. there is a person in ET who often comments to others. He is of the persuasion that two major trading modi are possible. Detecting which to use at any time, is one of his interests. Trending is one and reversion to the mean is the other for him. The eight year old game does just that. The eight year old game makes a second point, too: it says that a person can always be trading the ensuing price movement for profits under certainty instead of flipping a coin. Here certainty means a condition determined using a wholly deductive system that has a granularity as fine as the rules and price tic gradient level of any market anywhere that has a minimum liquidity. OTR bars behave with certainty just as every slower fractal does (a logic proviso is that all market variables have to be used) Under those conditions trading at more than five times the market capacity is a limiting factor.
65% is just above half, after slippage and expenses. No thanks, I do better than that without a guru.
I am not claiming to be a guru. I am not starting any threads telling people how to trade. Obviously, you another person like the admin here who does not know how to trade. There is very little slippage and commissions if you go with a future broker like Mirus, plus you only need $ 500 to trade per contract for normal market hours. I doubt you trade futures.
65% 1:1 uh?. A full 30% edge and you make the above posts uh?. Another delusional asshole internet millionaire liar. Bye-Bye. You'll be missed. LMAZO
Currently I am putting the finishing touches to my current future system. Here is a revenue report from C2 from a previous system. Names and e-mails from subscribers were taken out to protect their privacy.
Thanks for the fascinating thread on the concept of binomial distribution, presented in a fun, "real-life" fashion Whisky. Despite the usual suspects presenting their asinine though processes for all to see, the thread maintains itself at a high conceptual level, and perhaps these links can add to process. Coin Tossing - Probability Theory Coin Tossing - Probability Table Coin Tossing - Probability Simulator Good trading
The OP is not a retard, far from it, in fact. The thread isn't so much about a coin flipping trading system (which may or may not be workable, depending on how one approaches it) as it is about the concept of binomial distribution, introducing it to the traders on ET, and showing them how they can get the concept to work for them (no, I won't tell you how). Your stock swing system has as much relevance to this thread as people discussing how the made a killing in internet stocks during the tech boom ... and will pretty much have the same end result.