Discussion in 'Politics' started by Econmajor, Dec 3, 2007.
Since that other poll is bunk let's really look at the options.
I predict that 95% (as usual) of traders will pick the wrong candidate.
(Mouth twisted with lips closed).....Hmmm.....Now I'm jest an ol' cuntry boy, but seems ta me this here poll is a wee bit biased. Can somebody 'splain this to me?
Sure I can explain it to you. The other poll failed to include Ron Paul and the other category was winning easily.
So you have Ron Paul
All the other GOPers who spout the same ideas.
All the Democrats who spew out socialist rhetoric.
Then you have all the 3rd party candidates that actually have some good ideas but no one will listen to because of the 2 party voting bias.
Good plan, one major to another.
I think Ron Paul could be the thing the US needs now. I'm of liberal incline normally but once in a while a serious and reliable republican comes by. I would have voted for Pat Buchanan, I would have voted for Bush sr. and I would vote for Ron Paul.
My feeling is though that the current administration has so much to hide that they won't allow a maverick in the White House for another decade, neither D nor R. Either something will happen that gives the prez emergency powers to stay on another period, or the elections will get seriously rigged. I thing democracy is in danger in the US right now.
Or will he just be assassinated?
I am quite surprised at his success in gathering money. How can his poll numbers be so low with all that money? And please, I don't want to hear any conspiracy theories.
research the poll sampling. usually 300 registered republicans with landlines only.... old... (they watch fox)... and they voted for bush in 2004. not tech savvy. and then they lie about the results.
dont be an idiot all your life.
Separate names with a comma.