There we go again: "randomness" that deadbeaten TA horse. You could equally well apply randomness to golf. It would make as little or as much sense. The truth is that becoming a golf virtuoso or becoming a market virtuoso requires an unbelievable degree of skill. It can only be acquired and honed by an extraordinary amount of work, much more than what run of the mill loafers can bring up.
Watch what i just posted about my ACTUAL trade. But if you think they are fake, no problem, everybody is free to think what he wants. I see your remark rather as a compliment because it proves that, if it is real, it's remarkable.
There is some truth in what you say, but I don't completely agree. Hypothetically (although not realistically), let us say that you know all of the variables that can potentially affect the market. The problem still remains that you may not anticipate the direction of those variables or, equally important, the variable weightings that the collective market will assign to each of those variables on this particular occasion. That is what makes fundamental analysis so unwieldy. Therefore, lesser mortals such as myself resort to simple approximations such as TA (for lack of a better term), seeking to gauge market behavior via price, volume and the like, as a proxy. It can be quite effective, but it is admittedly fairly crude given the relatively few variables that are considered in assessing trade direction in something so dynamic as the market. Therefore, it is anything but flawless. However, your chosen trade examples are nearly flawless. I will leave it at that. Thank you, and good luck.
I don't want to, you already gave the answer why:the skeptics will remain skeptics (you can never convince them) In fact the main reason i started this tread was to tell that there are things possible that go beyond what is possible according to some people. So study and try to find the Holy Grail, don't listen to those who always say that this or that is impossible.
Why are you purposely being a turkey? I am not suggesting that good trading cannot overcome the element of randomness and produce profits. I am saying that the element of randomness will always keep trading from being flawless. Mr. Spike's examples are nearly flawless. Have a nice day.
I respect your point of view. But i cannot give up mine. That's why there are always buyers and sellers, winners and losers. Good luck
Fake means not generated by your posted so called system . I know very well that there are accurate forecasting and reversal methods able to generate those signals but you never posted any one of those . So that is where fake comes from.
Walther, why don't you post some of your own. We could then believe you when you say that you indeed "know very well" about such things. Spike would be crazy to tell us anymore about his.
This is not the first time that people try to provoke me in the hope that i would explain more "secrets". But i don't care what they say or think. I already past a long time ago the period where someone tries to get confirmation from others for it's own imagebuilding. I just trade and sometimes share a part of my years of experience with others. And i do it for free. If i share it's because i want to share, not because i want money or anything else.
I have posted plenty in my old journals. Those old post brought me recognition by most prestigious members of ET and collaboration with brightest researchers so you might have an idea how little I care if you or others believe me or not . I have proven my expertize on much higher levels . I was just letting Spike know that I know how he generates his signals and that I know that these posted signals were not generated by system he posted on ET. He is not crazy and neither am I .