Real Forex Trades

u get it winter?
get as wealthy and great as he is and then u'll understand.
now u are just a loozer with 2c in your acct and have no clue how to do things:
come back when u made a fortune and then u are allowed to talk.

 

Look at the "date" in your initial innuendo post. It shows the 20th. The original profile was posted on the 19th. That is a full "day" after the fact. You were questioning me on a 20th post that was merely updating the 19th, yet you claimed that the Position trade shown on the 19th with the profile was "late". That was wrong.

It was not "late" because it was defined as already having been closed AND simply part of the profile layout/format. Go take a close look at ALL the profiles posted. They ALL use the exact same format/layout with the first two Day Trade's listed followed by the Swing and then the Position dead last. I've been doing it this way for ages. If I join a board in the middle of the month, so be it - wait until next month to see the Position profile - it is just that simple.

You made a mountain out of a mole hill when there was no reason to do so, claiming a need to impress when there was a need to simply maintain format/layout. My very first post tells you to expect mulitple profiles covering multiple time-frames as part of the layout. So, there was no secret about the layout and I made certain that no one could get confused.

 

u are makin a mountain out of an mole hill; I only said it was after the fact not 'late'; u updated the trade a third time and I replied.

 

It says that you are not intellectually honest enough to admit when you were trying to be cute, and now that you've been pulled on the carpet about it, you want to save face.

That's what it says about you. The first problem for any addict to get over, is admitting fault and personal responsibility. You were trying to be cute with your drive-by-shooting post, I pointed out your fear of success and why this type of thread pushes your fear button by showing a post where you clearly demonstrated that fear of success by crying foul at a lousy 10% net gain per month and now you want to try and turn this into my problem.

The problem resides with people just like this, who cannot seem to do anything but clutter up perfectly fine threads with this type of childish, petty nonsense. This is where the problem resides. Now, you make further innuendo regarding what a wealthy person would be doing with his time, when you don’t know the first thing about how I spend my time seeing that you’ve only seen my posts on this board for under 96 hours. So, you would not know jack about how I spend my time, but you allude to it as though you do.

See – getting real means getting honest with your-self, first. The issues you are trying to bring into this thread along with Bits and the other guy, are clearly seen by anyone with half a brain and one eye still functioning in their head. Psycho –analyze yourself, as it might give you cause to pause before you initiate the slight-of-hand innuendo that guys like you offer up so much.

 

That's called making a distinction without a difference. You are not making a counter-distinctive argument. To the contrary, you are now arguing against yourself.

There is no difference in the tone and tenor of claiming that something was "late" -vs- "after the fact", in this context. That is not counter-distinctive. It is inline with innuendo and slight-of-hand comments meant to inject negativity into a thread - period.

No amount of weaseling now, is going to change that fact. You injected innuendo into a thread following your buddy like I’ve seen you do in other threads (one of which I pointed out).

Come on, guy – you don’t think that I was born yesterday – do you? You don’t really think that all of a sudden there is Bitstream Light – do you?

Come on – I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but I’m not this narrow. Got try to pull that over someone else, please.

 

re-read your posts before criticizin' others and see how defensive u got, detailin' your virtual resume' at every turn: that's a typical trait of an insecure person with very low self-esteeme. maybe u ought to change your attitude a touch and maybe no1 will jump in your thread questionin' everything u say.
just a thought

 

Hey Bit,

If it is any consolation to you, at least we do agree on Barak Obama! I think the guy deserves a shot, too – but just not yet. I think he needs a bit more “tuning” at the upper echelons of leadership. I think if you match him with somebody a bit “older” and a bit “wiser”, then they would make a good ticket for ‘08 – with Obama coming up for his shot in either ’12 or ’16. But, that’s just one man’s opinion, here.

Heck – at least we agree on something…

 

boy,
have u read all my 1000+posts?

ror!

 

Hey Bit,

I'm working on my third-career having done things in my first that many men only dream about. You don't have certain levels of success with low self-esteem and you also don’t get there by dumping on people and then wondering why they don’t just roll over and take it. You won’t find any defensiveness in my original posts at all – until – guys like you come into the thread with your off-setting and side-tracking innuendo. These facts are crystal clear and anyone can read the time-line of the thread and understand it.

I said, several posts ago that this was supposed to be a Trade Journal, not a place for petty, childish misrepresentations of reality. Yet, you guys continue on in the same vein not wanting to accept personal responsibility for your own actions where you took it upon yourselves to initiate the nonsense. You are asking me to believe that I:

1) Started a Trade Journal and initate it with defensiveness against himself.
2) Initiated the negative personal attacks preceded by negative innuendo.

Now, any common sense individual is going to immediately see a problem with this:

a) It is impossible to get defensive with yourself.
b) It is illogical to initiate personal attacks on yourself preceded by negative innuendo regarding your own Trade Journal.

So, when you logically sort these things out, Bit – the source of the problems becomes crystal clear – and it is not me. It all begins with those who initiate. It always has and always will.

But, I still agree with you on Barak.

 

LOL! Not quite. The past six years have given me a whole new outlook on research skills, however.