No problem with editing for accuracy, or even deletions to avoid getting the witness into avoidable hot water. That's not the kind of editing I was referring to. But what would you say if the edits changed a date, for example, to make the statement into an outright lie! If the President and Cohen, at that time, shared attorneys, was there any insertion, or changing of substantive facts. If so, did the change or insertion originate with Client #1 or Client #2? It could not have ethically originated, if substantive, with the Attorneys. "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."
so any collusion with Russians? I mean Cohen has nothing who does. .. what was the point of the investigation other than to stop the agenda hated by the establishment and their arm the deep state. Frankly I am pissed at Trump and all these also unethical and criminal assholes trying stop him from getting us out of wars, lowering our taxes and replacing obamacare and sealing our borders.
For anyone who doesn't want to read the entire thing, I'll just summarize: Orange Man bad. Orange Man racist. VERY racist. Orange Man lie. Very many lies. Also cheat. So, basically a dog and pony show for the NPC's.
Yeah, what happened to all of the Russian collusion that was so blatantly obvious to anyone that is a libtard? Many libtards posted on here inferring that it was a fact. Also, what happened to all of the Russian laundered money through properties that Trump didn't even own?
Yeah, but, Hillary Clinton who took tens of millions from Putin and Barack Obama who sold our uranium to Russia are not even subject to investigation? What about John Podesta? Paul Manafort worked for the Podesta's lobbying firm yet, he is the only one charged? The so called Russian ambassador who was a spy was in and out of the White House during Obama's term and again, not even a whimper or investigation? They said he was a Russian spy who visited the White House probably, a dozen times? What was he doing there and what are his ties to Obama?
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/27/michael-cohen-prague-steele-dossier/ MICHAEL COHEN PUTS DAGGER IN THE HEART OF STEELE DOSSIER DURING CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY “Have you ever been to Prague?” South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, a Republican, asked Cohen during a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing. “I’ve never been to Prague,” said Cohen, adding: “I’ve never been to the Czech Republic.”
Nothing in today's hearing. Cohen says he doesn't know of any. Right. If Cohen has nothing, nobody else does. Well, maybe Manafort. He learned how elections are hacked while working for Yanukovych. He took Trump campaign political poll results to Russians thinking it was a Borscht recipe. That's not collusion, that's just being helpful. Trump was playing golf and knows nothing. Manafort is not talking, hoping for a pardon for not doing anything. We shall assume our President is deaf dumb and blind and no one bothered to tell him what the Russians were doing or that Manafort was providing them with Borscht recipes, or that assange's dump originated, by accident of course, from the St. Petersburg operation. . It seems the connection to Russian operation has always been Manafort, but always with the best of intentions. The Donald is pure as the driven snow. Manafort is presently enjoying an all expenses paid vacation. In the meantime the nasty SDNY is busy as beavers. Gee, I can't imagine they'll find anything.
No bombshells, if anything I think this actually hurt the collusion argument, everyone already knows he's a racist and crooked businessman, and they knew that when he was voted in. Beat him at the polls.