So IF this is true, and IF they do not reopen (from your article it sounds as if this hasn't been decided) the data presented by the person in the tweet shows the historical impact of the school year thus far. So if she is wrong about schools reopening, that isn't lying or fraud as you imply. It was a decision that - as you just admitted - was pulled at the last moment. Doesn't change the past statistical impact of having these kids in school and the numbers accordingly. You're just so eager to discredit any dissenting voice that you've become the walking, talking personification of Cognitive Dissonance.
Reading the rest of her tweets she is pushing a political narrative while pushing piles of fake information on school re-openings. Once again you are taking information and data from bloggers and tweeters and pushing it as golden -- when it is actually fabricated nonsense. Do we need to point to the examples once again of you pushing fake Florida data from Jennifer Cabrera and others. It is time you stuck with data and information from mainstream sources.
Which tweets? The tweets I see are a study she seems to have been part of. There are lots of data. Show me which ones are outrageous or fake. Otherwise you're doing exactly as I accuse you of, and that is attacking and trying to discredit anyone with an idea that runs counter to YOUR Narrative for the simple reason that they don't follow YOUR narative.
Nearly all of her tweets push a political narrative while making false assertions, fabricating information, and twisting data. It is truly sad that bloggers and tweeters pushing nonsense are your go-to sources for information. Why don't you try some mainstream sources and wean yourself off the constant stream of fabricated crap which you embrace as your personal reality.
you can't change a con's stripes who's gone down the rabbit hole of "everything outside my twitter bubble/safe space is fake news".
I get that you're in full troll mode for responses today, but I'm always willing to discuss if you've got data showing something new that challenges the paradigm of my thinking. But if you're just going to come at me with the same info or claims that COVID does what viruses do, then of course I'm going to say "So what"? Again, show me the data that supports making the sacrifice of not sending my child to school (and all of the negatives that come with that) and if it is legit and dangerous, I will keep my child home. But you can't. Well, you specifically can't do anything but troll. GWB at least attempts to provide data and articles to help his narrative. You don't provide anything but fodder.
Pick one. Let's start there. Don't just throw out a generality that tries to discredit her. Show me a tweet that she makes fabricating information on. 2nd request.
Not worth my time and effort.... rational people can go read her nonsense and come to their own conclusions. The question is why your go-to sources are bloggers and tweeters pushing questionable information rather than mainstream sources.
Ah, I see. "Not worth my time". I kinda figured you'd back down. If you're going to call something questionable or fabricated, but then don't want to prove it is fabricated, then you're essentially just whining about something you don't like. If you want to take the effort to disprove (you won't) then I'm happy to discuss with you. Hell, you might even find something I agree is shady/shaky. But at this point, its just that you don't like the person because they challenge your narrative. Let me know if you'd like to back up your claims with anything later on. Regarding "mainstream sources", the answer is simple. Mainstream sources have been known to be as fallible and flawed as anyone else is. Even more so in today's polarized environment. Half the time these mainstream sources get their info from twitter and blogs nowadays anyway. You just like those tweets better because they fit the narrative.
it is no longer meaningful to refute the constant stream of fabricated blogger and tweeter sources you continually push. In the same way it's it not worth the time to debate if QAnon bloggers are questionable -- by going through a exercise of "pick one" and debunk it foolishness. They all are crap. Lets' just take a look at one of your previous favorite sources... ==================================================== Let's get into the source of the Jennifer Cabrera data you are pushing as "evidence" of a death conspiracy in Florida to push your anti-lockdown views. This is typical of the data sources you push. Let's take a further look at her chart and fabrications. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/desantis-for-the-win.345108/page-218#post-5246053