This is the problem I have with the teacher's position, which really is not the average teacher position but the union. If teachers are vaccinated and they still do hybrid with spread out class sizes and social distancing and mask rules, the risk is reduced down to condom levels.... I think teachers are upset about all the extra work they had to undertake for the virtual shift (quite understandable) without any increase in benefits, pay or gratitude (really understandable) but this stand they are taking now is certainly losing my support. EDIT: But then I look into it and realize it is mostly the union and not the teachers I speak with. I love all the teachers I speak with and eavesdropping on my son I heard his math teacher with her small children in the background. Imagine having to teach at home and your own kids also at home and juggling both. IMpossible. I do say it is the union because most teachers I spoke with say they are fine teaching with hybrid rules in place and after getting the shots. I am not sure the unions really speak for the opinion of most teachers.
I have family in this district and they were going back January 26th and now moved it to first week of March. The intent was to give more time for the teacher's to get vaccinated and today there is BoE meeting to outline plan to get back beginning of March. Vaccinations already started. If they complain about march 1st start date then we know it is smelling like bullshit. Every private school has gone hybrid in that area with small incidence and switched to virtual for a few weeks and then went back. My family's kids have great virtual teachers putting in a lot of effort. I do not think it is really them but the unions stomping their feet.
The parents want their children back in school because they are tired of babysitting them at home.... yeah we get it.... the parents with the worst behaved children are the loudest advocates of "f@ck the teachers, let them die" and demanding their little demon spawn are put back in school where they never follow the social distancing instructions (or even behave properly). Most of the loudest parents could care less about their children's education, they simply want them out of the house. Yeah, we get it.
Right, parents want their kids back in school because they are tired of baby sitting them at home. They don't care if there is a risk to them, right? Just get the kids out of the house, who gives a shit if they die. You're a jackass. If parents thought that kids were in danger they'd be ALL TOO HAPPY to have them home. I know I would. Any parent would. You don't have kids so it's not surprising. Pretend it was the dozen or so cats you live alone with. You'd feel bad if something happened to them, right? We don't care because we KNOW there is no danger to them. We KNOW this because the data for the past year proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt. And we smell the horseshit you and your ilk shovel daily. The stench of it is reaching to space.
Seeing that schools are not safe until all the kids are vaccinated they have a very valid point. The only way to maintain social distancing in schools is to use a hybrid model with only 1/2 or 1/3 of the kids in the building at once. Likewise all the other safety measures (masks, etc.) still need to be in place. Failure to do this simply means that children are spreading COVID to one another and bringing it home to their households. Many European countries were very successful at holding in-building classes with social distancing, hybrid-learning, and safety measures. The U.S. should learn from their example. Including the reality that if the prevalence of COVID in the local community is not low then it is not safe to hold school.
Once again -- Let's take a look at the the largest data set -- a study of schools in the U.S. with statistics and data from more than 6000 school districts for the fall semester which came to the conclusion that schools should not be open. Should Schools Stay Open? Not So Fast. Data on coronavirus cases in U.S. schools suggests in-person classes contribute to the virus’ spread. https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...why-schools-might-not-be-safe-during-covid-19 Of course, you are too busy pushing "open the schools" propaganda from Kremlin-controlled websites like ZeroHedge to spend time looking at real data.
Your biggest problem is that you spam so much bullshit that you don't stop to consider what the data actually says. You're just interested in discrediting anything and anyone that doesn't follow the Party line. You talk about the Kremlin mouthpiece and accuse people of all sorts of things yet you're the biggest editor for Pravda we have around here. Did you even stop to consider the source you just posted? Of course you didn't. Your source shows cases that students and "staff" have in COVID. What it doesn't, what it CAN'T possibly know is where those people actually contracted the virus. So you have a number of students and staff that have COVID. And this is supposed to tell us...what, exactly? That students get sick? That adults working in school catch COVID? This is news? Let's do this AGAIN. Lets see what risk children have from COVID. From Feb 1, state of Florida report for number of people - by age bracket - for cases, hospitalizations and deaths, shall we? Let's keep in mind there are 2.7 Million kids who go to K-12 schools in Florida. Google that if you don't believe me. Huh. So lets include ALL children under 24, not just K-12 (this should add more to the numerator, helping your cause). There have been a total of 44 deaths IN TOTAL from the beginning of the crisis. In the last YEAR. Let's do some simple math, you're always bragging about how you love to do math. 44 deaths / 2.7 MILLION school kids. Nevermind that most of those deaths are probably over 18 (see the demographic). That comes to .00001629 in terms of a risk rate. And because of these 44 deaths, of which most were probably above 18, you want to push to keep 2.7 MILLION kids from learning properly. From sports. From social interaction. You're a ghoul, that's what you are. Now. If you had ANY DATA showing the mortality rate of staff that caught the virus at school, and this imaginary data showed that these staff were more at risk, then you might have a case. But you have nothing. Nada. Zilch. ZIPPO.
Of course we're back to that! How big of a fucking idiot are you? If you can't prove that people got the virus from the school AND that they died from it, then you have no argument saying that schools shouldn't be back in session! I notice you skipped over all the facts and data. Can't have those, can we!