RBT - Reverse Brain Technology

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by The Expert, May 13, 2010.

  1. Sure Jack... it has a Sharpe Ratio of 60 just like you make 3X daily range :p

    P.S. Speaking of "natural cycles"... your P,V relation works no better than flipping a coin. Maybe you should try listening to the market instead of trying to tell it what you think it should do.

     
    #131     Jun 22, 2010
  2. It is OBVIOUS that Jack knows Jack Shit about trading:D

    T66 is not that far behind:eek:

    First TARGET hit, and I have even given up the prediction game a long time ago, as there is no need, really:cool:

    One day, you blind dumb ass traders will wake up from the dream world you are in, and SEE that trading is all about ACTION, not silly little mathematical exercises:D

    School BOYS to the last:D

    Now go away and stop ruining a good thread with your little school BOY antics.

    TE..aka..The Expert
     
    #132     Jun 22, 2010
  3. Now, where were we, oh yes, education, and how it is not conducive to making money trading.

    Win..Win..Win..bla..bla..bla

    Every parent wants their child to be the best in the class, the best on the pitch, the best in the pool, the best teeth, the best looking:eek:

    What a dumb ass society we live in, really:eek:

    We have become the consumer society, a bunch of useless thinkers who believe any shite that is presented.

    Why is everyone so fukin stupid:eek:

    Well, maybe it is because of the stupid fukin education system that they are exposed to!

    How about reversing it all and see what happens!

    How about we wanting our children to be the best losers:D

    Teach them young, that, to win the most you must first learn to lose the least:cool:

    Never try to be a winner, for, that is for real losers:D

    Good things come to all those who deserve it, but, to deserve it, you must first be deserving, and to be deserving, you must understand what it actually means.

    Time = Money

    Oh, if only Montaigne's words had been taken on board, then, today, we would not have so many "asses laden with books", and the world would be a more just and civil place, but, it is not, so we must learn what is required, and, more importantly, do what we need to do.

    TE
     
    #133     Jun 22, 2010
  4. [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    TE
     
    #134     Jun 22, 2010
  5. Attached is the current Universe for trading using the "Unusual Volume" one pager

    Enjoy.
     
    #135     Jun 22, 2010
  6.  
    #136     Jun 22, 2010
  7. What are you trying to say ??? An image of a statue and a graph, don't get it.
     
    #137     Jun 22, 2010
  8. This one is the best:D

    IDC does not repeat

    How about just some plain old ACTION :cool:

    Look at what happened to Woodie and Grey 1:eek:

    I can never understand, if, traders are able to make GOOD money, why then do they have to go all commercial:confused:

    Is there something we DON'T KNOW:D

    TE
     
    #138     Jun 23, 2010
  9. BA, who do you think the statue is?

    What purpose does it serve to know about this person?

    How will it help one become a better trader?

    What does the graph show, and, more importantly, what does it NOT show?

    Sometimes, I wonder, if I am too cryptic, as, I do not want to called "the most annoying little thing in the world", for, that title is for JH:D

    TE
     
    #139     Jun 23, 2010
  10. I'm not Big Arrow, but I'll answer these just for fun:

    "who do you think the statue is?"
    Montaigne (per previous post)

    What purpose does it serve to know about this person?
    Father of modern skepticism, yada, yada, yada

    How will it help one become a better trader?
    Depends on how you interpret his essays.

    What does the graph show, and, more importantly, what does it NOT show?
    A point in time where price can proceed in two directions with two well defined targets. Which way is it headed? Is asking this question at that point in time even important? We don't know until it tells us, thus it does "NOT show" its hand as of yet (although some may disagree).
     
    #140     Jun 23, 2010