Rape charge recommended for Israeli president

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Oct 15, 2006.

  1. You are free to support your claims by posting links where I supported Putin's actions that are violent and repressive, etc.

    Since you are unable to do so, because I am not supportive of such things, your attempt to red herring away from the possible crimes of the Israeli president reveals you simply cannot handle the possible truth of the crimes he is accused of...

    See, this is about him, and the crimes he is charged with...and nothing else.

    Your logical fallacy is duly noted though, and is par for your course of never ending defense of those Israelis who engage is crimes toward mankind.


     
    #21     Oct 16, 2006
  2. I thought I had heard everything from this pathetic troll.

    Now he seems to be positioning himself on the other side of the argument. After taking a lambasting in earlier threads for his moral relativism, he now seems to be arguing from the other side, condemning moral relativism!!!

    Absolutely sickening.

    Yes, you are truly a Man of God, as you always claim.
     
    #22     Oct 16, 2006
  3. More Gobbledygook

     
    #23     Oct 16, 2006
  4. Ahhh.. it's so sweet when you admit that you no longer want to debate a point because you are feeling attacked and you have no rebuttal.

    See you in another 3 months, when I will own you again, effortlessly.

    And btw... remember to try to keep your positions straight. You are for moral relativism, not against it. The arguments you make are from a moral relativist perspective, i.e. that we cannot absolutely condemn acts like the beheading of the young girl because they must be taken in cultural context. That was your argument a few months ago, loser. That's the one where a bunch of guys called you out as a moral relativist. Remember, it's all in the archives.

    Damn those archives, huh?
     
    #24     Oct 16, 2006
  5. Even more Gobbledygook

     
    #25     Oct 16, 2006
  6. lol... ad hominem in place of even a cursory attempt at rebuttal... how sweet it is.

    It's actually quite fascinating that you feel you can argue from the moral relativist perspective so forcefully, and then when it suits you, just pretend that you never said any of that and start arguing from the other side.

    Once again, you absolutely, unequivocally define the concept of intellectual dishonesty. Your failure to even attempt a rebuttal is not surprising, given that the proof of your about-face is so easy to find. You are reduced to colored-text posting as a form of denial/evasion/rebuttal.
     
    #26     Oct 16, 2006
  7. What, no name calling yet?
    Dissapointed:(
     
    #27     Oct 16, 2006
  8. Even more and more Gobbledygook

     
    #28     Oct 16, 2006
  9. I never accused you of supporting Putin's actions, I accused you of ignoring Putin's actions, unless of course you can post a link where you started a thread criticizing Putin. I accused you of obsessing with Israel, I accused you of cherry-picking anti-israel information, I accused you of criticizing two countries in the world only (the US and Israel), I accused you of ignoring real crimes and real injustices happening in the world each one of which is infinitely worse than what Israel and the US have done or will ever do.

    PS while it's unfortunate that Israeli president committed a crime, Israel should be proud that they can prosecute him, few countries in the world have these kinds of laws and these kinds of liberties.
     
    #29     Oct 16, 2006
  10. Offer up some proof or evidence that I have ignored Putin's actions to support your accusations. Pooty Poot should be condemned for his actions that are of a violent and fascist nature...really, that goes without saying, doesn't it? I don't support violence nor actions that are restrictive of basic human rights...or are you suggesting that I do support violence and supression of human rights?

    In addition, just try to make a case for my having an "obsession" with Israel.

    I post articles when Israel's leadership is in the wrong, and take a position when I think they are in the wrong...hardly an obsession.

    However, your over-reaction and emotionalism is duly noted.

    p.s. You are terribly confused with leadership and a country. I and strongly opposed to Mr. Bush and his leadership, but hardly anti-American. Were I to see leadership in Israel of a more human rights oriented and less violent and "eye for an eye" mentality, I would be supportive of such leadership. Sadly, people confuse the temporary custodians who are in leadership positions as being the country...they are not. No more than Saddam was Iraq. I do think Zionism is a mental disorder, in the same way that Islamic extremism is a disorder, Nazism was/is a disorder, etc. Not all Israelis, and not all Jews are supportive of their current foreign and domestic policy, and you damn well know it.

     
    #30     Oct 16, 2006