Now, speaking of the Holocaust, I am no authority about the Holocaust, but I do have a healthy skeptical mindset. In the Washington Times of Monday, I read a big article"Archives detail horrors of Nazi death marches". Well, it says here that they ordered 20,000 prisoners transfered from Buchenwald to Dachau, noting that the other camps were "overcrowed". This was at the very end of the war. Well, I guess my immediate question here is 'if the Nazis were so determent to slaughter 6 million Jews, why were the other camps overcrowed if there has been this massive policy to murder jews in a systematic version by the German government? It says "In the 1944-1945 winter the Nazis began emptying the concentration camps and destroying their records. Partly to cover up their crimes.". And yet now, we are hearing in other reports that there are massive numbers of German records, that are still in existance, which detail the "Mechanism of Death" as they put it. Well, either the records are there or they were destroyed. Now, I am getting confused. I hear in January of 1945 they report 60,000 prisoners were herded in groups, several thousand at a time, from the Auschwitz extermination camp to march westwards. Now, that's a lot of work. To transfer 60,000 people. Now, if Auschwitz was an extermination camp, it seems to me that if it was so effective as we have been repeatetly told, then the Germans would have had a very easy time in shooting or gassing or burning 60,000 people if their process was such a machine of death as we are being told. Now see, these are just little items in a very long story, and I look at them, and it just seems to me that there are some contradictions here. Just in your basic news stories, you can start reading things into them and realise that there is much more to it, but you know, if I were to make these comments on German, Swiss, or Canadian soil - I could go to jail for saying these things. That's why we have to be concerned about the first amentment. They are determined to put an end to the first amentment. They are determined to put an end to freedom of speech. They are determined to prevent us from investigating further. Many, many issues. Not just the Holocaust, and I don't even mean to focus on the Holocaust. I think to get a really good idea on what this is all about, you should get the book "Night" by Elie Wiesel. Published in 1946 or 47. His claims are that at Auschwitz, they weren't Gassed nor shot or electrocuted, they didn't have diesel engines going in a room to kill them. His claims are that they had burning pits were Jews were thrown in and burned alive. And not only that, he also claims that they had a smaller pit for the children. The interesting thing about his book it that it has been reprinted in several languages, and the various editions of his book in different languages are completely different, strangely enough. Also, keep in mind that Mr. Wiesels book contradicts many other books by survivers.
Unfortunetaly for the sensation lovers, they only exist in allied propaganda. I might give a more detailed explanation on this later.
The Lie: Hitler forced Czechoslovakia to surrender to the Reich. The Sudetenland is an area encompassing the Sudete mountains in Bohemia. Sudeten Germans made up the vaste majority of the population. After the Austro-Hungarian broke up in 1918, German Bohemia and the Sudetenland were created as political entities. After WWI, the Sudetenland was placed in the new Czech State at the Paris Peace Conference. However, a Nazi Party was founded in Czechoslovakia called the Sudetendeutsche Partei under the leadership of Konrad Henlein. In free elections, Henlein won more than 60% of the German vote in 1935 and more in 1938, Henlein called for a return of the Sudentenland the Germany. In September of 1938, the Munich Conference was held and the Czech government agreed to cede to the Reich all territories with more than a 50 percent German population. This came by voluntary agreement, and not by force. The issue was peaceably settled. The Czechs simply did not (and STILL do not) have sufficiently large numbers to exist outside a large, modern nation state. Only with modern technology could they ever hope to maintain their "nation". In 1943 the American Mercury identifies the real Hess mission â the Hitler proposal: âHitler offered total cessation of the war in the West. Germany would evacuate all of France except Alsace and Lorraine, which would remain German. It would evacuate Holland and Belgium, retaining Luxembourg. It would evacuate Norway and Denmark. In short, Hitler offered to withdraw from Western Europe, except for the two French provinces and Luxembourg [Luxembourg was never a French province, but an independent state of ethnically German origin], in return for which Great Britain would agree to assume an attitude of benevolent neutrality towards Germany as it unfolded its plans in Eastern Europe. In addition, the Führer was ready to withdraw from Yugoslavia and Greece. German troops would be evacuated from the Mediterranean generally and Hitler would use his good offices to arrange a settlement of the Mediterranean conflict between Britain and Italy. No belligerent or neutral country would be entitled to demand reparations from any other country, he specified.â If Churchill really was an anti-Bolshevik, why would an alliance with a communist habitual murderer be preferable to coexistence with a revitalized German continental country?
Adolf Hitler was not a racist as Jews claim he was. Hitler's claim was to think of Germany for the Germans without having a foreign Jewish element within it that alienated Germans from their own country. He believed the Aryen race to be the greatest in the world, but that was nothing but innocent patriotism. Except if you continue to believe the Jesse Owens hoax, one can not come to the conclusion that Hitler hated other races. The few thousands of blacks living in Germany in the 30s had equal rights as the Germans. This fact caused a lot of protest among the more extremist nazis, but Hitler never acted against these blacks in any hostile way. Sure, he would have opposed racial mixing, but that doesn't mean he hated the black race. Had Hitler been a racist and supremacist, as post-war propagandists make out he was, then Haj Amin Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, who admired Mein Kampf, would never have co-operated with the National Socialists. Likewise, had Hitler been a racist, then he would never have accepted Muslim volunteers from the Balkans for his SS fighting force, the first true multi-national European defence unit, long before NATO was set up. NATO is primarily an organisation belonging to about 1,500 Jewish families, something that was graphically illustrated during 1999. When Poland wished to join NATO, it first had to pass anti-'Holocaust' laws, which it did in January 1999. Then in April of that year it was permitted to join NATO. By June, the first Polish person prosecuted under the new law was brought to court, academic at Opole University, Dr Darius Ratajczak. There is another fact that explains why Adolf Hitler outlawed organizations, for example the Freemasons in Germany, and considered them to be a subversive force. That Jews still desire to restore King Solomon's Temple is a message recited once a month by Freemasons the world over - often without knowing that they are pushing a Jewish agenda as they recite their mission. The Sanhedrin in Israel have already begun to assemble a replica of the temple, and are prepared to place it where the Al Aqsa Mosque now stands in Jerusalem. As soon as the sign is given in the form of a red-haired calf that has no impurities, such as a single white hair, then the dismantling of the mosque will begin - so, according to Biblical prophecy - and King Solomon's Temple will be re-stored.
Is it that `Publisher' is embarrassed by what the great man actually had to say? Or is `Publisher' aka WAKE-UP aka PLATO2 - his ET-names are legion - simply an illiterate? Or, just possibly, is he an intellectually sloppy moron who's never bothered with reading the actual words of his greatest hero? The result of all racial crossing is therefore in brief always the following: (a) Lowering of the level of the higher race; (b) Physical and intellectual regression and hence the beginning of a slowly but surely progressing sickness. To bring about such a development is, then, nothing else but to sin against the will of the eternal creator. And as a sin this act is rewarded. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) The Jew has always been a people with definite racial characteristics and never a religion. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) Due to his own original special nature, the Jew cannot possess a religious institution, if for no other reason because he lacks idealism in any form, and hence belief in a hereafter is absolutely foreign to him. And a religion in the Aryan sense cannot be imagined which lacks the conviction of survival after death in some form. Indeed, the Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) If we consider how greatly he has sinned against the masses in the course of the centuries, how he has squeezed and sucked the blood again and again; if furthermore, we consider how the people gradually learned to hate him for this, and ended up by regarding his existence as nothing but punishment of Heaven for the other peoples, we can understand how hard this shift must be for the Jew. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) The Jew almost never marries a Christian woman; it is the Christian who marries a Jewess. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) Peoples which bastardize themselves, or let themselves be bastardized, sin against the will of eternal Providence. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) Was there any form of filth or profligacy, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew involved in it? If you cut even cautiously into such an abscess, you found, like a maggot in a rotting body, often dazzled by the sudden light - a kike! Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord. Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf) National Socialism is not a cult-movement - a movement for worship; it is exclusively a 'volkic' political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship. ⦠We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement. Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else in any case something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our programme there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a divine will-- not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship, but openly before the face of the Lord. ⦠Our worship is exclusively the cultivation of the natural, and for that reason, because natural, therefore God-willed. Our humility is the unconditional submission before the divine laws of existence so far as they are known to us men. Adolf Hitler (Speech delivered in Nuremberg, 6 September 1938). It's passing strange that `Publisher' should act so embarrassed and coy about his beliefs, and the beliefs of his greatest hero. By way of contrast: Hitler had the courage to state what he thought right out in the open. His vile racism remains as clear today as it was on the day it was expressed. I really can't, for the life of me, imagine why any of Hitler's modern admirers would go to such lengths to pervert and deny the great man's plain meaning, or pretend that he didn't do and say the things that, indeed, they admire him for. It seems more and more clear that `Publisher' reads and thinks at about a third grade level. It's for sure that he argues almost as well as any petulant, hateful school-child. News flash: Jerusalem Arabs circa 1930-39 were not exactly widely known for their favourable opinions towards Jews, and the great majority of Arab governments favoured the Nazis during WWII. Hitler's open hatred towards the Jews and the open legal actions he had taken against them were selling points for all Arabs who favoured war with the Jews of Palestine. Hitler's racism and pathological Jew-hatred were facets of his personality that made him attractive to Grand Mufti Haj Amin el-Husseini, a religious leader who had always been particularly vile in his own expressions of hatred towards the Jews. Haj Amin el-Husseini in fact travelled to Berlin in order to speak with German diplomats: to make an offer of his assistance to the German government in extirpating the Jews of Palestine. He was rebuffed.
Racism wan't a serious issue in the first half of the 20th century. Actually it still isn't,- racism becomes a problem only when more than one race reside in a country that can be called "racist". There wasn't one world leader at the time who was not a racist. FDR and Churchill had an ethic hatred towards Japanese, and this is well documented. While the Americans were enjoying their "Roaring Twenties", Germany had fallen into utter economic (inflation-reparation), and political chaos. Adolf Hitler single handedly put a nation back together and stood it on its feet. Millions of Germans, (and many around the world), thought Hitler was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Germanys ulimate crime was that it stood up to the International Jew. Today the whole human race has become annother piece of property; a plaything in the hands of the Eternal Jew. What the Jews did to Germany was inexcusable. Not only were they known to support Communist movements prior to 1933, they were also known to be involved in treachary in WW1. Does that justify hatred? Well, although I must say that deporting Jews to camps was more or less a crime, we have to remember that we need to properly view Hitlers hatred for Jews in context. Hitler, blaming the Jews for WW1, which, although correct, is wrong because not ALL Jews were involved in it. Millions have died after the injustice of Versailles, and the Jews had basically bought up everything that was of of any monetary value. In addition, The Jews have an ethic sense of racial supremacy vis-a-vis gentiles, and Hitler was well aware of this. Therefore, the hatred was mutually shared, and was not coming from exclusively one side. Hitler was not even as much of a "racist" as most other European leaders, for he opposed European nations having too many collonies. His alliance with Japan was prove of this fact. We must remember that Adolf Hitler was human. In spite of what propagandists say; He did not want to go to war against the whole world. Quote: "I hate this war; I should be building cities, not destroying them!" Do you know that in WWII, only Germany had Sarin and Tabun, which were 100% German developments. The fact that Hitler didn't use these weapons during his defense of the Reich speaks volumes. Both to how the Germans waged war, and against the ridiculous claims that Hitler exterminated people with diesel engines in the concentration camps. Hitler was probably the strongest leader of modern history. I myself certainly do not entitle everything that Hitler did as 'perfect'. But he should at least be given credit where credit is due. He wasn't the 'evil dictator' that almost everyone imagines.
Listen to audio of the Ballad of Mary Phagan: </div> <p align="center"> <embed width="337" height="45" src="http://home.att.net/~texmextex/littlemary.mp3"></p> <p align="center"><font color="#FFFFFF"></font></p> <h4 align="center"><a href="http://home.att.net/~texmextex/littlemary.mp3"> <span lang="en-us"><font color="#FFFFFF"></font></span></a><span lang="en-us"><a Read the text below as the audio plays Little Mary Phagan, she went to town one day She went to the pencil fact'ry, to get her little pay She left her home at eleven, when she kissed her mother good-bye Not one time did the po' child think, she was goin' right to die Leo Frank met her, with a blues we hardly know He smiled and said, "Lil' Mary, now you go home no mo'" He sneaked along behind her, 'til she reached the little room He laughed and said, "Lil' Mary, you met your fatal doom." She fell upon her knees, to Leo Frank she pled Because she was virtuous, he hit her across the head The tears rolled down her rosy cheeks, the blood flowed down her back She remembered tellin' her mother what time she would be back He killed lil' Mary Phagan, was on one holiday Then called for ol' Jim Conley to take her body away He took her to the basement, bound hand and feet Down in the basement, lil' Mary lay asleep Newt Lee was the watchman, when he went to wind the key Down in the basement, lil' Mary he could see He called for the officers, their names I do not know They came to the pencil factr'y, saying, "Newt Lee, you must go." They took him to the jailhouse, locked him in a cell The poor ol' innocent nigger, knew nothin' for to tell I have a notion in my head, when Frank comes to die He took his damnation in the courthouse in the sky The astonished asked the question, the angels they do say Why he kill lil' Mary, upon one holiday? Come all of you good people, wherever you may be, Supposin' little Mary belonged to you or me? Her mother sets a-weepin' She weeps and mourns all day She prays to meet her baby In a better world some day Judge [inaudible] passed the sentence You bet he passed it well [inaudible] Sent Leo Frank to
Here is Hitler's mistake clearly seen. And here we see that it is the same mistake that everyone else is making, including the religion that takes my name in vain. God did not make the "natural" world! He made neither form, space, time nor the bodies in it. Making no form, he placed no beings in prison...nor does he maintain such prisons. Since he did not make it, there is no divine Will for it's maintenance. Since he made no time, all planning for the future is a defense against the truth. There is no such thing as "clear-cut" perception, since the purpose of perception is to obscure. God did not make perception, nor the beliefs that must grow in it like mushrooms in a dark cave. Perception is a world you made to set up a will opposed to God's. All within the world have invested in this idea...so it seems "natural". Yet, it is a world of perception that I am come to save you from! Who needs perception when he can have knowledge? Perception is for dreams and nightmares. Whether happy or sad, they are not real. Forgive, then, the dream and the dreamers, and forgive yourself for dreaming along with them. Jesus
What more is there to say: `Publisher' actually is completely deranged, and a cowardly scum-sucking little Jew hater. He spends his whole life anonymously posting Nazi and KKK propaganda re-treads on a trading website. He rails against phantasms and visions with which he has filled his slimy little mind. So he's quite right, when it comes to himself. He is a plaything in the hands of the `Eternal Jew.' Franz Stangl, Commandant of Sobibor (March-September, 1942), and Treblinka (September, 1942 - August, 1943), speaking at the time of his 1970 West German trial for war crimes: "Regarding the question of the optimum amount of people gassed in one day, I can state: according to my estimation a transport of thirty freight cars with 3,000 people was liquidated in three hours. When the work lasted for about fourteen hours, 12,000 to 15,000 people were annihilated. There were many days that the work lasted from the early morning until the evening . . . I have done nothing to anybody that was not my duty. My conscience is clear.' " What a hoot! In the Fall of Berlin, the murderous little coward ended his days by eating a bullet from his own gun, while he left sixteen year old soldiers, former members of the Hitler Jugend, to face Soviet tanks and heavy machine guns. Is that the way strong leaders act? Why don't you take a leaf from his book and stick your Lueger up your ass? You'd be doing humanity a favour.