1. I'm amazed anyone answered you in a civilized manner, since you certainly didn't deserve it. 2. You're scum.
I did acknowledge that, I only corrected your improper use of "OCD". Why is everybody in the P&R forum so angry?
Laudable but Quaint if not naive disposition in light of the historical context of individual freedoms vs the collective .
...and you must be a 'Hard-J'. :eek: :eek: :eek: There's a simple test to prove my accusation. Pity you don't have the same.
Everyone wants to know what made him tick. The truth is: there is nothing to know and nothing more to learn. Everything that can be known is known, has been for years and years. A man on the street (those who had contact with him) can state the obvious and did. Nothing can be done to profile his behaviour to prevent the next one. He has civil rights. ----------------------- Every day some untreated nutcase inflicts damage on someone somewhere, tragic and sad.
I'm still not 100% positive that 'nothing could have been done' to stop this. What if the disturbed individual in question had been given a plethora of cannabis, benzos, ketamine & opiates to put a chemical collar on his clearly dangerous psyche? Instead of being encouraged to take these drugs for the benefit of society, he was legally prohibited from doing so. I realize he managed to find pot anyways, but the question remains. I'm sure no one was handing him any prescriptions for oxy, diluadid, or K. Perhaps not even Xanax. A steady supply of these things could have completely neutralized his urge to kill. We need the government to protect us from people, not drugs. (This post is about to become troll bait. Edit: Wait for it, here it comes... Edit: Ahhhh, there we go! That train came right on time. )