Rally Ahead - Obama Real Birth Certificate Shown

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AMT4SWA, Sep 10, 2010.

  1. I guess I need to keep up. She was actually sanctioned for literally wasting the court's time down in Georgia, and then this stupe of a fool and, now, a welsher, was told by the Supreme Court to pay up:

    It doesn't surprise me that you and the rest would still be trying to put this steaming crapload before all of us. None of you are interested in facts, reason, or anything relating remotely to reality, and when you are confronted by real people wanting real facts, you resort to all your usual bullshit.
    I'm done. You and the rest are a waste and a bad joke.
     
    #31     Sep 11, 2010
  2. What does a Judge getting mad at a Lawyer have to do with Obama and his eligibility?

    You libs are so incensed that you can't see str8. Only an idiot would think he is not hiding information about his birth.
     
    #32     Sep 11, 2010
  3. Libs like these?

    <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GT1SXCQgv2A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GT1SXCQgv2A&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

    Glenn Beck on birther issue: 'Dumbest thing I've ever heard'
    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=120992



    :confused:
     
    #33     Sep 11, 2010
  4. Well remember now this is the NEW america.....hot coffee at McDonald's that you spill on YOURSELF is just fine for $125 million lawsuit, but a "selected" minion fall guy (with how many different names???) who HAS NEVER SHOWN his original birth certificate, college transcripts, or student aid records, is just fine running for Prez!!! :D :D :D

    Oh I forgot.....his grandmother worked for VERIFIED CIA front group, his mom worked for timmy geithner's father (Ford Foundation......UUUGGHHH.....just go look at that groups ties!!!), and his dad (pick one....LOL!!!) worked for CIA front group......VERIFIED!!! So for the FIRST TIME in recent history a "selected" minion salesman for the oval office has not shown one of the key requirements/documents to serve in office!

    What a disgusting pathetic level of LOW STANDARDS the timid and docile american masses have ALLOWED for SOME of those who serve. When I put my a$$ on the line for this country I had to bring my real birth certificate to sign up, when I had my top secret security clearance I had to go through a 10 year FBI/DIA background check, heck even in the airline industry I still had to go through 10 year FBI background checks.

    The WHOLE birther issue is a psy op to let you know you can't do $hit to stop them from whatever they want to do.........when they can even get a portion of the masses to DEFEND their OBVIOUS impropriety it just shows you their capability. The ability to CON so many into LOVING their masters FILLS them with dangerous empowerment.......get ready for EXPANDED OPERATIONS AHEAD! :eek:
     
    #34     Sep 11, 2010
  5. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Your mental stability is inversely proportional to your use of exclamations.
     
    #36     Sep 22, 2010
  6. If a friend or acquaintance posed the question: "Who uses someone else's Social Security number?" how would you answer them? (I was going to say who uses a phony Social Security number, but since Uncle Sam is now recycling Social Security numbers because they are close to running out of them, just about any combination of numbers you put together today will be someone's Social Security number.) Most likely the first thought that would come to your mind when asked that question would be: "An illegal alien." Second would be someone intent on committing identity fraud, since having access to a person's name and Social Security number is like getting the key to their assets. That's why identify theft is a class C felony. Class C felonies, depending on the State in which the crime is committed, carries prison sentences from 10 up to 40 years. In other words, using someone else's Social Security number in order to conceal your own identity or lack of standing as a citizen, is a serious crime although most illegal aliens who are caught using someone else's Social Security number are simply deported.

    But what do you do if the guy living in the White House uses Social Security number 042-68-XXXX that was actually issued in the State of Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 to an individual who was born in 1890? Interestingly, the SSN does not appear in the Social Security death index and now has two dates of birth tied to it: Aug. 4, 1961 and the year 1890. As a US Senator, this man used an entirely different Social Security number—282-90-XXXX. It should have been pretty easy for the federal government's paymaster to flag this one since this is the best known person in America. The latter Social Security number was used by Sen. Barack Hussein Obama and the former one was used by Obama when he moved to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. No one in the federal government or, for that matter, in the Social Security Administration seemed to notice the slight discrepancy. A guy with the same name in the Oval Office and the Hart Office Building were using different SSN numbers? Is there a bureaucrat anywhere in Washington, DC who thinks there are two Barack Obama's running around Washington? Okay. It's possible. But, not in the US government—one in the Senate and one in the White House. If there was, everyone in the country would know that. But I guess it would be possible to have "name coincidence" in the District. But, how about 27 of them all named Barack Hussein Obama? That's not like being named John Smith where you have a couple dozen in every phone book in America.

    Or that his wife, Michelle Obama, who is a natural born US citizen, has used at least four false SSNs? One of the four numbers she uses, is 282-88-XXXX. This is the SSN number she uses in the White House and it is likely her original SSN (even though she was using 350-60-XXXX when she lived at 5046 Greenwood Avenue in Chicago in Aug. of 2005, some three years or more before taking up residency in the White House). The earliest records found on the 350-SS number by Ohio private investigator Susan Elizabeth Daniels, who was hired by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was dated 2005. Also hired by Taitz to ferret out the SSNs used by Obama was Mission Hills, CA private investigator Neil Sankey who formerly served as a detective for Scotland Yard before becoming a naturalized citizen of the United States. Taitz is challenging Barack Obama's constitutional right to reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. And while court after court has refused to force Obama to produce his original long form birth certificate to verify that he was born in the United States and is constitutionally qualifies to hold the office of President, in her lawsuit, Civil Action 10-151, filed on Mar. 22, 2010, Taitz is pushing the issue and is not likely to give up until Obama produces his birth certificate or admits he has none. Her current case, Civil Action 10-151 is being heard by Presiding Judge Royce Lamberth, US District Court for the District of Columbia. Taitz filed a motion to allow a Quo Warranto proceeding. Quo warranto is been suppressed at the federal level (and in most States) because it forces politicians to answer to the people for acts they commit while in office (by forcing the politician to show by what authority they acted as they did.) It is a "citizens' remedy" under the 9th Amendment. It allows the people to use the Constitution against the politician who has committed a breach of public trust. As I said, it is for that reason that few State courts allow its application as well—it simply empowers the people too much. That danged old Constitution just keeps getting in the way of those trying to govern. Must be why the social progressives are trying so hard to get rid of it.

    In December, 1981, when Congress passed the Omnibus Reconciliation Act to restore minimum benefits under the Social Security Act of 1981, it added a provision that made it a federal felony for anyone to "...willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity of any other person) [furnish] or cause to be furnished false information to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the establishment and maintenance of records provided for in section 405(c)(2) of this title." In other words, when you appropriate, for personal use, someone else's Social Security number—even if the SSN-owner is now deceased, the wrongful use of that number is a felony.
     
    #37     Sep 22, 2010
  7. da-net

    da-net

    Do you have anything that you can counter the points raised by AMT4SWA in his post of 09-11-10 07:16 PM? if yes, please show us so that both sides can be evaluated as to their worth.

    Or is the best that you can do is to "attack the messenger" and you have nothing else?

    Do you have anything to counter the points raised by WilburBear?

    edit: Thank you 377OHMS for the reply..I think its time to add you to my ignore list.
     
    #38     Sep 22, 2010
  8. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Yep, common sense, an engineering background and mental competency. You folks lack all three.
     
    #39     Sep 22, 2010
  9. #40     Sep 22, 2010