Rachel Maddow get's destroyed

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Maverick74, Aug 12, 2012.

  1. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Actually Ron, I want to go back a lot further then that. Let's go back to 1815. Certainly back before 1913 before the Fed and the national income tax act. Nothing really interesting came out of the 1950's. Sorry Ron.
     
    #11     Aug 12, 2012
  2. You have no point.
     
    #12     Aug 12, 2012
  3. Max E.

    Max E.

    1815?!?! Wow, you REALLY want to fuck our good friend Ron, dont you?..... :D
     
    #13     Aug 12, 2012
  4. Max E.

    Max E.

    Yep no way to get around it, Obama hates elderly people.... :D
     
    #14     Aug 12, 2012
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    Actually, that bit she did on the sleaziest pieces of shit<sup>1</sup> Ohio state reps gaming their voting hours was quite good.

    <sup>1</sup> Thanks, Max.
     
    #15     Aug 12, 2012
  6. maddow obviously has sexual identity issues.

    It's cute when a 6 yo girl dresses up in daddy's clothes, not so much when their over 30 and pretend to "be" daddy.
     
    #16     Aug 12, 2012
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    1) what's wrong with the 50's?

    2) as far as I know YOU are the only one who keeps mentioning the 50's

    3) you're full of shit as usual
     
    #17     Aug 12, 2012

  8. Unemployment in the 50s was pretty stable at around 3 to 4% for most of that decade(and was as low as 2.5% in 1953.) So yes...the GOP DOES want to send us back to the 50s.
     
    #18     Aug 12, 2012
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    We also had a top tax rate of 84%, although barely anyone paid it.
     
    #19     Aug 12, 2012
  10. John is a joke, he pretends to be worldly but really is quite provincial. The thing about people who make 35k don't pay taxes and thinking Peoria was a suburb of Chicago let me know who I was talking to. Then he got mad and wanted to fight.

    Funny.:D
     
    #20     Aug 13, 2012