There is no other method Jack has besides Cash Cow that's ever been published. Since Jack likes to trade ES or has put up charts on ES or his followers have, the only symbol that method works on and in is .SPX at Fidelity. That's the only method that makes a significant enough profit to warrant the banter whenever he talks. As to the others, there aren't any other threads with backtested performance statistics or tradeslists, so I'm the only one, but others can see what the metrics looked like and until we have more backtests from the method it is futile to even engage a logical discussion about JHFM.
As I thought, you're not actually acquainted with Hershey's methods. You're talking only about somebody else's initial learning experience of Hershey's method for swing trading high quality stocks. No SCT, and no first hand understanding of Hershey's price / volume based method. From earlier in this thread:
Having nothing much better to do in this slow market, as all 25 of my codes comprising some 1700 SLOCs are done, undone, redone, and overdone, I thought to aggravate the Hersheyites with this instructive little scattergram for their uninstructable little scatterbrains. It is the first 32 five minute bars of today's NQ close and volume connected progressively, starting with the lowest point in the chart. X-axis is volume, Y-axis is close. PV relationship? Kiss my ass! Looks more like my relationship with my inlaws.
Let me follow up with my concise view of Jack's contribution to ET. Jack will assert something provocative like "The moon is made of green cheese!" Well, strange, but you research it, and learn something about the true composition of the moon. Next Jack may claim that "The earth is flat!" OK, I'll try out that notion and see what I learn, and I find all the contrary evidence. I have been reading him for almost as long as he has been posting here. Thanks to him, I know a lot of things which are true about trading. And it is ungrateful but comprehensive to point out that few of those truths bear much resemblance to what he posts.
Particularly PVT and SCT were what was published by spyder in the wl4.wealth-lab forums. It was not profitable. No matter where you backtest those methods there's no public backtest other than the one T666 publishes, and also matches the results I get when backtesting a portfolio simulation in Wealth Lab's Portfolio Simulator. The explanation of cash cow by Scottd is there for you to code, but you'll need my data or even my version of Jack's program. Baro-san, if you do have backtests please publish here. PVT/SCT are one and the same method, published for the Wealth Lab community, but, as I said, was not found to be profitable. Jack's Cash Cow is the only one that has published code, backtests, and tradeslists.