He did release a trading version of it that Trader666 and anybody else who backtests it knows isn't profitable. PVT is a myth. And I don't know why whenever anybody talks about Jack's method that they always have less than 1000 posts when they do mention in the affirmative to have traded it.
Depending on where that is in the thread, there were later versions I modified, removing particularly the exit on close. So I'd made modifications for it to work. I don't care how many people have downloaded it, because that is the exact method Scottd wanted to forward test but couldn't because Tradestation's datafeed does not support the ticker symbol it is intended for, and since many probably read that thread, even less understand that that is Jack's method. They'd understand more if they downloaded that, stuck it into wealth lab, but most traders don't use that product, so my suggestion to them is to take Scottd's cash cow last version and take the Ascii datafiles for the real symbol .SPX 5 minute then analyze whether the backtest is profitable. This isn't complicated to test a 100% objective method, and as I've tried to emphasize, Fidelity Investments is the only place you can get Wealth Lab, and the only place that has index options data in a continuous form, so if that sounds too hard for you, nothing less should be expected from Hersheyites sticking their heads into the sand whenever evidence to the contrary rears up. And that is as Scientific as evidence can get. There's no reason to read all the drivel on these message boards. That is the method, and if you aren't convinced, then read my perl code, compare it to scottd's, modify one of the two, and make sure you load the data from an ascii formatted dataset and see if it doesn't reach out to you, because there isn't anyone on here that has ever posted performance statistics data therefore it is out of public domain in the realm of faith based trading, and faith based trading cannot ever be profitable until proven otherwise. To deny this is to deny the scientific method, and unless kpwrmixer comes up with backtests it's still useless to even debate whether Jack Hershey's method works or not. You are a useless defender of a senile old man, nkhoi, and since you like to delete evidence what would have made your contribution much better as a moderator is to actually post the link to that thread.
No, there are heavy handed moderators, and when it comes to Hershey, you are one of them. The post I made on Christmas Eve was very explicit, not that I used cuss words, but that it got under your skin that I know so much about his method that I can't stand hearing Jack misleading other people. I'm still waiting on backtests and tradeslists. Without those, this is all fake, except for what I've done and referenced in these threads.
Let's talk shop Jack ... This isn't a sleepy shop, no time for siesta. We are open for business ... then fiesta. Look in the Windows of the shop, everything on display This is a cool place to window shop.
If it would have said increasing and decreasing the secret would have been given out. Next time bring your secret decoder flashlight to class